Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Dec 6;10(1):699.
doi: 10.1186/s13104-017-3040-8.

Collaborative modeling of an implementation strategy: a case study to integrate health promotion in primary and community care

Collaborators, Affiliations

Collaborative modeling of an implementation strategy: a case study to integrate health promotion in primary and community care

Gonzalo Grandes et al. BMC Res Notes. .

Abstract

Background: Evidence-based interventions are more likely to be adopted if practitioners collaborate with researchers to develop an implementation strategy. This paper describes the steps to plan and execute a strategy, including the development of structure and supports needed for implementing proven health promotion interventions in primary and community care.

Results: Between 10 and 13 discussion and consensus sessions were performed in four highly-motivated primary health care centers involving 80% of the primary care staff and 21 community-based organizations. All four centers chose to address physical activity, diet, and smoking. They selected the 5 A's evidence-based clinical intervention to be adapted to the context of the health centers. The planned implementation strategy worked at multiple levels: bottom-up primary care organizational change, top-down support from managers, community involvement, and the development of innovative e-health information and communication tools. Shared decision making and practice facilitation were perceived as the most positive aspects of the collaborative modeling process, which took more time than expected, especially the development of the new e-health tools integrated into electronic health records.

Conclusions: Collaborative modeling of an implementation strategy for the integration of health promotion in primary and community care was feasible in motivated centers. However, it was difficult, being hindered by the heavy workload in primary care and generating uncertainty inherent to a bottom-up decision making processes. Lessons from this experience could be useful in diverse settings and for other clinical interventions. Two companion papers report the evaluation of its feasibility and assess quantitatively and qualitatively the implementation process.

Keywords: Community of practice; Health education; Health information technologies; Health promotion; Implementation research; Implementation strategies; Learning community; Participatory action research; Preventive care; Primary health care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Extended framework to include implementation research in the process of developing and evaluating complex interventions. Modified from Pinnock et al. [37]. Reproduction authorized by the Editors
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Percentage of professionals who participated in each of the collaborative modeling sessions out of the total number of professionals of the primary care center
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Structure and actions of the new PVS health promotion strategy

References

    1. Waterman H, Tillen D, Dickson R, de Koming K. Action research: a systematic review and guidance for assessment. Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(23):III. doi: 10.3310/hta5230. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Grol R, Grimshaw J. From best evidence to best practice: effective implementation of change in patients’ care. Lancet. 2003;362:1225–1230. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14546-1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kottke TE, Solberg LI. Optimizing practice through research: a preventive services case study. Am J Prev Med. 2007;33:505–506. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2007.08.003. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Leykum LK, Pugh JA, Lanham HJ, Harmon J, McDaniel RR., Jr Implementation research design: integrating participatory action research into randomized controlled trials. Implement Sci. 2009;4:69. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-4-69. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Øvretveit J. Evaluating improvement and implementation for health. Maidenhead: Open University Press, McGraw-Hill Education; 2014.

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources