Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Oct 19;2(10):432-437.
doi: 10.1302/2058-5241.2.160085. eCollection 2017 Oct.

The surgical treatment of acromioclavicular joint injuries

Affiliations

The surgical treatment of acromioclavicular joint injuries

Michele Boffano et al. EFORT Open Rev. .

Abstract

Acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) injuries are common, but their incidence is probably underestimated. As the treatment of some sub-types is still debated, we reviewed the available literature to obtain an overview of current management.We analysed the literature using the PubMed search engine.There is consensus on the treatment of Rockwood type I and type II lesions and for high-grade injuries of types IV, V and VI. The treatment of type III injuries remains controversial, as none of the studies has proven a significant benefit of one procedure when compared with another.Several approaches can be considered in reaching a valid solution for treating ACJ lesions. The final outcome is affected by both vertical and horizontal post-operative ACJ stability. Synthetic devices, positioned using early open or arthroscopic procedures, are the main choice for young people.Type III injuries should be managed surgically only in cases with high-demand sporting or working activities. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2017;2:432-437. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.2.160085.

Keywords: acromioclavicular joint; conservative treatment; shoulder; surgical treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

ICMJE Conflict of interest statement: None declared.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
‘TightRope’ device (figure reproduced with permission from Arthrex, Naples, USA)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Laprade RF, Surowiec RK, Sochanska AN, et al. Epidemiology, identification, treatment and return to play of musculoskeletal-based ice hockey injuries. Br J Sports Med 2014;48:4-10. - PubMed
    1. Lynch TS, Saltzman MD, Ghodasra JH, et al. Acromioclavicular joint injuries in the National Football League: epidemiology and management. Am J Sports Med 2013;41:2904-2908. - PubMed
    1. Rios CG, Arciero RA, Mazzocca AD. Anatomy of the clavicle and coracoid process for reconstruction of the coracoclavicular ligaments. Am J Sports Med 2007;35:811-817. - PubMed
    1. Rockwood CA, Jr, Williams GR, Jr, Young DC. Disorders of the acromioclavicular joint. In: Rockwood CA, Jr, Matsen FA, III, eds. The Shoulder. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders, 1998:483-553.
    1. Tossy JD, Mead NC, Sigmond HM. Acromioclavicular separations: useful and practical classification for treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1963;28:111-119. - PubMed