Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2018 Jan 15;124(2):325-334.
doi: 10.1002/cncr.31138. Epub 2017 Dec 6.

Dose, schedule, safety, and efficacy of guadecitabine in relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Dose, schedule, safety, and efficacy of guadecitabine in relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia

Gail J Roboz et al. Cancer. .

Abstract

Background: Outcomes for patients with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML) are poor. Guadecitabine, a next-generation hypomethylating agent, could be useful in treating such patients.

Methods: In this multicenter, open-label, phase 2 dose-expansion study, AML patients from 10 North American medical centers were first randomized (1:1) to receive subcutaneous guadecitabine at 60 or 90 mg/m2 on 5 consecutive days in each 28-day cycle (5-day regimen). Subsequently, another cohort was treated for 10 days with 60 mg/m2 (10-day regimen).

Results: Between June 15, 2012, and August 19, 2013, 108 patients with previously treated AML consented to enroll in the study, and 103 of these patients were treated; 5 patients did not receive the study treatment. A total of 103 patients were included in the safety and efficacy analyses (24 and 26 patients who were randomly assigned to 60 and 90 mg/m2 /d, respectively [5-day regimen] and 53 patients who were assigned to 60 mg/m2 /d [10-day regimen]). The 90 mg/m2 dose showed no benefit in clinical outcomes in comparison with 60 mg/m2 in the randomized cohort. Composite complete response (CRc) and complete response (CR) rates were higher with the 10-day regimen versus the 5-day regimen (CRc, 30.2% vs 16.0%; P = .1061; CR, 18.9% vs 8%; P = .15). Adverse events (grade ≥ 3) were mainly hematologic, with a higher incidence on the 10-day regimen. Early all-cause mortality was low and similar between regimens. Twenty patients (8 on the 5-day regimen and 12 on the 10-day regimen) were bridged to hematopoietic cell transplantation.

Conclusions: Guadecitabine has promising clinical activity and an acceptable safety profile and thus warrants further development in this population. Cancer 2018;124:325-34. © 2017 The Authors. Cancer published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Cancer Society. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.

Keywords: SGI-110; acute myeloid leukemia (AML); guadecitabine; refractory; relapsed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Mean LINE‐1 demethylation by (A) dose and schedule and (B) clinical response. The mean LINE‐1 demethylation is compared with the baseline during the first cycle of therapy for the 3 dose and schedule cohorts. The data are presented as means; the error bars are the standard errors. CRc indicates composite complete response; LINE‐1, long interspersed nuclear element‐1.
Figure 2
Figure 2
(A) Overall survival with the 60 and 90 mg/m2 5‐day regimens. Kaplan‐Meier estimates are presented for overall survival with the randomized 2 doses of the 5‐day schedule. Patients were not censored for hematopoietic cell transplantation. The median survival was 7.1 mo with 60 mg/m2 and 5.0 mo with 90 mg/m2 (P = .246). (B) Overall survival with the 5‐ and 10‐day regimens. Kaplan‐Meier estimates are presented for the overall survival of patients on the 5‐day regimens (combined arms) and the 10‐day regimen. Patients were not censored for hematopoietic cell transplantation. The median survival was 5.7 mo with the 5‐day regimens and 7.1 mo with the 10‐day regimen (P = .7783). (C) Overall survival by the response to guadecitabine. Kaplan‐Meier estimates are presented for all patients treated with guadecitabine according to their response: composite CR, CRi or CRp, or all other outcomes (P < .0001). CR indicates complete response; CRi, complete response with incomplete blood count recovery; CRp, complete response with incomplete platelet recovery.
Figure 3
Figure 3
(A) Overall survival by HCT as subsequent therapy. Kaplan‐Meier estimates are presented for the overall survival of patients who were bridged to allogeneic HCT and those who were not. (P < .0001). (B) Overall survival of patients with a CRc by subsequent HCT. (C) Overall survival by baseline cytogenetic risk. Kaplan‐Meier estimates are presented for the overall survival of patients with intermediate‐risk cytogenetics and patients with poor cytogenetics (P < .0018). CRc indicates composite complete response; HCT, hematopoietic cell transplantation.

Comment in

References

    1. Mangan JK, Luger SM. Salvage therapy for relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia. Ther Adv Hematol. 2011;2:73‐82. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ramos NR, Mo CC, Karp JE, Hourigan CS. Current approaches in the treatment of relapsed and refractory acute myeloid leukemia. J Clin Med. 2015;4:665‐695. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Roboz G, Rosenbalt T, Arellano M, et al. International randomized phase III study of elacytarabine versus investigator choice in patients with relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32:1919‐1926. - PubMed
    1. Issa JP, Garcia‐Manero G, Giles FJ, et al. Phase 1 study of low‐dose prolonged exposure schedules of the hypomethylating agent 5‐aza‐2′‐deoxycytidine (decitabine) in hematopoietic malignancies. Blood. 2004;103:1635‐1640. - PubMed
    1. Kantarjian HM, Thomas XG, Dmoszynska A, et al. Multicenter, randomized, #open |label, phase III trial of decitabine versus patient choice, with physician advice, of either supportive care or low‐dose cytarabine for the treatment of older patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:2670‐2677. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types