Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2017 Dec;10(12):e005463.
doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.117.005463.

Pharmacologic Prevention of Incident Atrial Fibrillation: Long-Term Results From the ALLHAT (Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial)

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Pharmacologic Prevention of Incident Atrial Fibrillation: Long-Term Results From the ALLHAT (Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial)

Thomas A Dewland et al. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2017 Dec.

Abstract

Background: Although atrial fibrillation (AF) guidelines indicate that pharmacological blockade of the renin-angiotensin system may be considered for primary AF prevention in hypertensive patients, previous studies have yielded conflicting results. We sought to determine whether randomization to lisinopril reduces incident AF or atrial flutter (AFL) compared with chlorthalidone in a large clinical trial cohort with extended post-trial surveillance.

Methods and results: We performed a secondary analysis of the ALLHAT (Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial), a randomized, double-blind, active-controlled clinical trial that enrolled hypertensive individuals ≥55 years of age with at least one other cardiovascular risk factor. Participants were randomly assigned to receive amlodipine, lisinopril, or chlorthalidone. Individuals with elevated fasting low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels were also randomized to pravastatin versus usual care. The primary outcome was the development of either AF or AFL as diagnosed by serial study ECGs or by Medicare claims data. Among 14 837 participants without prevalent AF or AFL, 2514 developed AF/AFL during a mean 7.5±3.2 years of follow-up. Compared with chlorthalidone, randomization to either lisinopril (hazard ratio, 1.04; 95% confidence interval, 0.94-1.15; P=0.46) or amlodipine (hazard ratio, 0.93; 95% confidence interval, 0.84-1.03; P=0.16) was not associated with a significant reduction in incident AF/AFL.

Conclusions: Compared with chlorthalidone, treatment with lisinopril is not associated with a meaningful reduction in incident AF or AFL among older adults with a history of hypertension.

Clinical trial registration: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00000542.

Keywords: antihypertensive agents; atrial fibrillation; atrial flutter; primary prevention; renin-angiotensin system.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Selection of Study Participants from the Overall ALLHAT Cohort AF, atrial fibrillation; AFL, atrial flutter; CMS, Centers for Medicare Services; ECG, electrocardiogram.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Multivariable Predictors of Incident Atrial Fibrillation or Flutter *Per 5 year increase in age. †Compared to White non-Hispanics. ‡Per 5 kg/m2 increase. §Per 10 ml/min/1.73 m2 increase. ||Per mEq/L increase. #Per 10mg/dl increase. Error bars denote 95% confidence intervals. Hazard ratios describe the adjusted association between the given variable and AF/AFL after controlling for all clinical variables included in the Figure, antihypertensive treatment assignment, and statin treatment assignment. CI, confidence interval; GFR, glomerular filtration rate; HR, hazard ratio.
Figure 3
Figure 3
ALLHAT Treatment Randomization and Incident Atrial Fibrillation or Flutter *Compared to chlorthalidone. †Compared to usual care. Error bars denote 95% confidence intervals. Adjusted hazard ratios describe the adjusted association between treatment randomization and incident atrial fibrillation or flutter after adjustment for all clinical variables included in Table 1. CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio.

Comment in

References

    1. Naccarelli GV, Varker H, Lin J, Schulman KL. Increasing prevalence of atrial fibrillation and flutter in the United States. Am J Cardiol. 2009;104:1534–1539. - PubMed
    1. Lin HJ, Wolf PA, Kelly-Hayes M, Beiser AS, Kase CS, Benjamin EJ, D’Agostino RB. Stroke severity in atrial fibrillation. The Framingham Study. Stroke. 1996;27:1760–1764. - PubMed
    1. Benjamin EJ, Wolf PA, D’Agostino RB, Silbershatz H, Kannel WB, Levy D. Impact of atrial fibrillation on the risk of death: the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation. 1998;98:946–952. - PubMed
    1. Wolowacz SE, Samuel M, Brennan VK, Jasso-Mosqueda J-G, Van Gelder IC. The cost of illness of atrial fibrillation: a systematic review of the recent literature. Europace. 2011;13:1375–1385. - PubMed
    1. Marcus GM. Predicting incident atrial fibrillation: an important step toward primary prevention. Arch Intern Med. 2010;170:1874–1875. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data