Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Dec 6;8(1):1961.
doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-01867-9.

Human CD26high T cells elicit tumor immunity against multiple malignancies via enhanced migration and persistence

Affiliations

Human CD26high T cells elicit tumor immunity against multiple malignancies via enhanced migration and persistence

Stefanie R Bailey et al. Nat Commun. .

Abstract

CD8+ T lymphocytes mediate potent immune responses against tumor, but the role of human CD4+ T cell subsets in cancer immunotherapy remains ill-defined. Herein, we exhibit that CD26 identifies three T helper subsets with distinct immunological properties in both healthy individuals and cancer patients. Although CD26neg T cells possess a regulatory phenotype, CD26int T cells are mainly naive and CD26high T cells appear terminally differentiated and exhausted. Paradoxically, CD26high T cells persist in and regress multiple solid tumors following adoptive cell transfer. Further analysis revealed that CD26high cells have a rich chemokine receptor profile (including CCR2 and CCR5), profound cytotoxicity (Granzyme B and CD107A), resistance to apoptosis (c-KIT and Bcl2), and enhanced stemness (β-catenin and Lef1). These properties license CD26high T cells with a natural capacity to traffic to, regress and survive in solid tumors. Collectively, these findings identify CD4+ T cell subsets with properties critical for improving cancer immunotherapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

S.R.B, M.H.N. and C.M.P. have a provisional patent for the use of CD26high T cells for adoptive cell transfer therapy. The remaining authors declare no competing financial interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Human CD26high T cells are activated and display antitumor activity. CD4+ lymphocytes were isolated from healthy donor PBMCs, sorted by CD26 expression and stimulated with magnetic beads coated with CD3 and ICOS agonists (cultured at a ratio of 1 bead to every 5 T cells). T cells were transduced 36 h post-activation with a lentiviral vector encoding a first generation chimeric antigen receptor that recognizes mesothelin and stimulates the CD3ζ domain. These cells were expanded for 10 days with IL-2 (100 IU/ml). a, b NSG mice were subcutaneously injected with 5e6 M108 mesothelioma cells. Forty days post-M108 establishment, mice were intravenously infused with 1e5 human CD26neg or CD26high T cells redirected to express MesoCAR. Tumors were measured bi-weekly (N = 10 mice per group). P values for the tumor curve were calculated by one-way ANOVA with a Kruskal-Wallis comparison using final tumor measurements from day 62. c–g Graphical representations of transcription factors (c–f N = 10) and cytokine production (g N = 3) by sorted T cells isolated from multiple healthy individuals prior to bead stimulation. In g, the frequency of FoxP3+ cells from the enriched CD26neg or CD26high cultures secreting inflammatory cytokines were assayed by flow cytometry. P values for c-e were calculated using a Mann-Whitney U Test. Data with error bars represent mean ± SEM. *P  < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; ****P < 0.0001
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
CD26int T cells are naive, whereas CD26neg/CD26high T cells are differentiated. a Sorting strategy: CD4+ T cells were isolated from buffy coats from healthy individuals and FACS-sorted into bulk CD4+, CD26neg (bottom ~ 10%), CD26int (middle ~15%), and CD26high (top ~10%). b, c Memory phenotype for all subsets was determined using flow cytometry (b N = 26) and gene array analysis (c N = 3–5) prior to bead stimulation. For c, RNA was isolated and gene expression assessed by OneArray. Heat map displays (+/−) log2-fold change in memory-associated genes. d, e Graphical representation of co-stimulatory and co-inhibitory markers determined by flow cytometry (d N = 20–26) and gene array (e N = 3–5) prior to bead stimulation. Surface marker expression in d was calculated and graphed as a fold change of CD26neg, CD26int, and CD26high T cells compared to bulk CD4+P values were calculated using a One-way ANOVA with a Kruskal Wallis comparison. Error bars represent mean ± SEM. **P < 0.01; ****P < 0.0001
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
CD26 defines CD4+ T cells with naive, helper, or regulatory properties. CD4+ T cells were isolated from healthy donors and sorted by CD26 expression (Fig. 2a). Representative FACS plots (a) and phenotype data (b N = 26) from multiple healthy individuals. c Heat map of (+/−) log2-fold change in expression of CD4+ subset-associated genes (N = 3–5) prior to bead stimulation. d, e Human CD4+ T cells were sorted into bulk CD4+, CD26neg, CD26int, CD26high, Th1 (CXCR3+CCR6), Th2 (CCR4+CCR6), Th17 (CCR6+CCR4+), and Th1/Th17 (CXCR3+CCR6+). DNA was isolated from sorted T cells prior to expansion of TCRβ sequences using an immunoSEQ kit and subsequent analysis. Data shown is the percent TCRβ overlap between groups (d) and a Venn diagram (e) displaying the overlap frequencies of identical TCRβ sequences between CD26neg, CD26int, CD26high, and Th1/Th17 subsets (N = 4). P values for b and d were calculated using one-way ANOVA with a Kruskal-Wallis comparison. Error bars represent mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ****P < 0.0001
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
CD26high T cells are multi-functional and enzymatically active. CD4+ T cells from healthy individuals were isolated and sorted by CD26 expression (Fig. 2a). a, b Sorted T cells were activated with PMA/Ionomycin and Monensin for 4 h prior to intracellular staining (N = 26). In b, three independent donors were analyzed by FlowJo software and graphed to display the percentage of cells simultaneously secreting 1–5 cytokines (IL-2, IFNγ, TNFα, IL-17A, IL-22). c Supernatant was collected from cells at pre-activation (0) and 1, 6, and 12 days post-activation time points for ELISA (N = 2; data shown is representative of two individual experiments). d T cells activated in vitro were subjected to intracellular staining (N = 5–11). e 1e5 sorted cells per group from pre-activation (0) and 10 days post-activation were cultured with the CD26 ligand gly-pro-P-nitroanalide for 2 h at 37 °C and analyzed for colorimetric changes to determine enzymatic activity (N = 5). P values in a and e were calculated by One-way ANOVA with a Kruskal-Wallis comparison. Error bars represent mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; ****P < 0.0001
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Human CD26int and CD26high T cells regress/slow established tumors. CD4+ T cells were isolated from healthy individuals, sorted by CD26 expression, transduced to express MesoCAR, and expanded for 10 days. a, b NSG mice bearing large M108 mesothelioma tumor (established for 60 days) were infused with 1e6 human CD4+, CD26neg, CD26int, or CD26high T cells. Post-ACT, tumors were measured bi-weekly until mice were killed and organs harvested at 75 days post-ACT (N = 7–9 mice per group). P values for the tumor curve were calculated by one-way ANOVA with a Kruskal-Wallis comparison on the final day when mice from all comparison groups were still alive (NT vs. all groups = day 38; CD26neg vs. CD26high = day 59). c Percent change in tumor size from baseline (day 0) to endpoint (day 75) was calculated and graphed as a Waterfall plot. d Graphical representation of tumor weights (g) harvested from treated mice 75 days post-ACT. e, f NSG mice bearing established pancreatic tumors (PANC1) were infused with 1.75e6 human CD4+, CD26neg, CD26int, and CD26high T cells and tumors were measured bi-weekly for more than 3 months (N = 6–9 mice per group). P values for the tumor curve were calculated by one-way ANOVA with a Kruskal-Wallis comparison on the final day when mice from all comparison groups were still alive (All groups = day 84). g Graphical representation of tumor weight (g) harvested from mice 97 days post-ACT. hj Tumors from all treated mice were harvested, digested, and run through a strainer. Resulting cell suspension was stained for flow cytometry and graphed relative to tumor size (small <100 mm2, medium = 100–200 mm2, large >200 mm2). P values for d, h and i were calculated by one-way ANOVA with a Kruskal-Wallis component. Data with error bars represent mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; ****P < 0.0001
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
CD26high T cells have stemness and increased migratory capacity. a, b Tumors from treated PANC1-bearing mice (from Fig. 5) were harvested and then frozen in cryomatrix. Tumor samples were then sliced and used for immunohistochemistry analysis (purple = H&E, brown = CD45; N = 5–9 tumors per group). Magnification = ×10. In b, the integrated optical density (IOD) of CD45 in CD26-sorted groups was quantified with ImageJ software and graphed (N = 5–8 per group). c Sorted T cells were activated with CD3/ICOS beads and expanded in 100 IU/ml IL-2 for 10 days prior to testing cell migration via a transwell assay. 0.75e6 sorted cells were re-suspended and assessed for percent cell migration towards M108 or PANC1 supernatant in a 2 h time period (N = 5). d, e Sorted T cells were analyzed for chemokine receptor expression by flow cytometry (d N = 12–15) and gene array (e N = 3–5) prior to bead stimulation. In e, data shown in heat map as (+/−) log2-fold change in chemokine receptor expression compared to bulk CD4+. f Viability of T cells that migrated towards PANC1 was determined by live/dead staining (N = 3). g Anti-apoptotic and stemness genes were analyzed and displayed as a (+/−) log2-fold change compared to bulk CD4+ (N = 3–5). hj Protein from pre-activation (day 0) and post-activation (day 10) cells was isolated and used for western blot analysis (N = 2–3). In j, the fold change of β-catenin, BCL2 and cleaved Caspase-3 for each subset compared to bulk CD4+ T cells was graphed (N = 2–3). P values were calculated using a One-way ANOVA with a Kruskal-Wallis comparison. Data with error bars represent mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
CD26 identifies three CD4+ T cell subsets with distinct properties. Depiction of our observations on CD26 expression and cellular therapy described herein. CD26neg T cells, despite their enhanced capacity to migrate, fail to regress tumors due to regulatory properties, decreased persistence, and increased sensitivity to cell death. CD26int and CD26high T cells exhibit similar antitumor activity, but have vastly different immunological properties. Despite their decreased migration, CD26int T cells are naive and capable of persisting long-term. CD26high T cells, despite their differentiated phenotype, exhibit several anti-apoptotic and stemness features, persist long-term, co-secrete multiple cytokines, and cytotoxic molecules and have a natural capacity to migrate towards various established solid tumors

References

    1. Topalian SL, et al. Survival, durable tumor remission, and long-term safety in patients with advanced melanoma receiving nivolumab. J. Clin. Oncol. 2014;32:1020–1030. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.53.0105. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pedicord VA, Montalvo W, Leiner IM, Allison JP. Single dose of anti-CTLA-4 enhances CD8+ T cell memory formation, function, and maintenance. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2011;108:266–271. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1016791108. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. June CH. Adoptive T cell therapy for cancer in the clinic. J. Clin. Invest. 2007;117:1466–1476. doi: 10.1172/JCI32446. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Morgan RA, et al. Cancer regression and neurological toxicity following anti-MAGE-A3 TCR gene therapy. J. Immunother. 2013;36:133–151. doi: 10.1097/CJI.0b013e3182829903. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Robbins PF, et al. Tumor regression in patients with metastatic synovial cell sarcoma and melanoma using genetically engineered lymphocytes reactive with NY-ESO-1. J. Clin. Oncol. 2011;29:917–924. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.32.2537. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms