Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 May;19(3):232-245.
doi: 10.1017/S1463423617000706. Epub 2017 Dec 7.

A realist evaluation of social prescribing: an exploration into the context and mechanisms underpinning a pathway linking primary care with the voluntary sector

Affiliations

A realist evaluation of social prescribing: an exploration into the context and mechanisms underpinning a pathway linking primary care with the voluntary sector

Marcello Bertotti et al. Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2018 May.

Abstract

This article adopts a realist approach to evaluate a social prescribing pilot in the areas of Hackney and City in London (United Kingdom). It unpacks the contextual factors and mechanisms that influenced the development of this pilot for the benefits of GPs, commissioners and practitioners, and reflects on the realist approach to evaluation as a tool for the evaluation of health interventions. Primary care faces considerable challenges including the increase in long-term conditions, GP consultation rates, and widening health inequalities. With its emphasis on linking primary care to non-clinical community services via a social prescribing coordinator (SPC), some models of social prescribing could contribute to reduce the burden on primary care, tackle health inequalities and encourage people to make greater use of non-clinical forms of support. This realist analysis was based on qualitative interviews with users, commissioners, a GP survey, focus groups and learning events to explore stakeholders' experience. To enable a detailed analysis, we adapted the realist approach by subdividing the social prescribing pathway into stages, each with contextual factors, mechanisms and outcomes. SPCs were pivotal to the effective functioning of the social prescribing service and responsible for the activation and initial beneficial impact on users. Although social prescribing shows significant potential for the benefit of patients and primary care, several challenges need to be considered and overcome, including 'buy in' from some GPs, branding, and funding for the third sector in a context where social care cuts are severely affecting the delivery of health care. With its emphasis on context and mechanisms, the realist evaluation approach is useful in understanding how to identify and improve health interventions, and analyse in greater detail the contribution of different stakeholders. As the SPC is central to social prescribing, more needs to be done to understand their role conceptually and practically.

Keywords: community health; health inequalities; link workers; primary care; public health; realist evaluation; social prescribing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest

Comment in

  • Social prescribing in general practice.
    Frostick C, Bertotti M. Frostick C, et al. Br J Gen Pract. 2019 Oct 31;69(688):538-539. doi: 10.3399/bjgp19X706157. Print 2019 Nov. Br J Gen Pract. 2019. PMID: 31672801 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

References

    1. Arain I. 2015: Keep Well in NHS Highland. Mid-term evaluation of the Keep Well Programme in NHS Highland. Inverness: NHS Highland Keep Well Programme Steering Group.
    1. Bandura A. 1986: The explanatory and predictive scope of self-efficacy. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology 4, 359–373.
    1. Bertotti M., Frostick C., Findlay G., Netuveli G., Tong J., Harden A., Renton A., Carnes D., Sohanpal R. and Hull S. 2015: Social prescribing: integrating GP and community assets for health. Report commissioned by Health Foundation (shine award), London.
    1. Bickerdike L., Booth A., Wilson P.M., et al. 2017: Social prescribing: less rhetoric and more reality. A systematic review of the evidence. British Medical Journal Open 7, e013384. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brandling J. and House W. 2007: Investigating into the feasibility of a social prescribing service in primary care: a pilot project. Bath: University of Bath and Bath and North East Somerset NHS Primary Care Trust.

Publication types