Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Dec 8:23:5826-5833.
doi: 10.12659/msm.907919.

Decreased Lymphocyte-to-Monocyte Ratio Predicts Poor Prognosis of Acute Ischemic Stroke Treated with Thrombolysis

Affiliations

Decreased Lymphocyte-to-Monocyte Ratio Predicts Poor Prognosis of Acute Ischemic Stroke Treated with Thrombolysis

Hao Ren et al. Med Sci Monit. .

Abstract

BACKGROUND Our previous study found that lower lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) is an independent risk factor of clinical outcome of acute ischemic stroke (AIS). However, whether lower LMR is independently associated with adverse prognosis of AIS treated with thrombolysis has not been determined. In this study, we explored the relationship between LMR and prognosis of AIS treated with thrombolysis. MATERIAL AND METHODS We retrospectively enrolled 108 patients treated with thrombolysis. LMR was calculated according to lymphocyte count and monocyte count on admission. Patients were classified into 3 groups according to LMR values on admission (group 1 LMR >4.34, group 2 LMR 2.79 to 4.34, group 3 LMR <2.79). Neurologic impairment was estimated by use of the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale. Clinical prognosis at 3 months was assessed by modified Rankin Scale. The relationship between LMR and neurologic impairment was analyzed by Spearman rank correlation. Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) was used to evaluate the ability of LMR to predict outcome. RESULTS Patients in group 3 had lower lymphocyte counts and LMR values and higher monocyte counts (P<0.001). LMR value was negatively correlated with the degree of neurologic impairment (r=-0.372, P<0.001). The ROC suggested a moderate sensitivity (71.6%) and specificity (80.5%) of LMR for predicting prognosis with an optimal cut-off point at 3.48. Higher LMR value was an independent protective factor against adverse prognosis (odds ratio 0.683, 95% confidence interval 0.490-0.952, P=0.024). CONCLUSIONS A lower LMR value is an independent predictor of poor prognosis of AIS treated with thrombolytic therapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest

None.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Correlation between lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) and NIHSS score. LMR – lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio; NIHSS – National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of the lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) predicting values of 3-month functional outcome. AUC – area under the curve; CI – confidence interval.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Mozaffarian D, Benjamin EJ, Go AS, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics – 2016 update: A report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2016;133:e38–360. - PubMed
    1. Gan Y, Wu J, Zhang S, et al. Prevalence and risk factors associated with stroke in middle-aged and older Chinese: A community-based cross-sectional study. Sci Rep. 2017;7:9501. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Powers WJ, Derdeyn CP, Biller J, et al. 2015 American Heart Association/American Stroke Association focused update of the 2013 guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke regarding endovascular treatment: A guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2015;46:3020–35. - PubMed
    1. Rodrigues SF, Granger DN. Leukocyte-mediated tissue injury in ischemic stroke. Curr Med Chem. 2014;21:2130–37. - PubMed
    1. Liberale L, Montecucco F, Bonaventura A, et al. Monocyte count at onset predicts post-stroke outcomes during a 90-day follow up. Eur J Clin Invest. 2017;47(10):702–10. - PubMed