Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Sep;9(9):2992-3004.
doi: 10.21037/jtd.2017.08.98.

Goal-directed fluid restriction using stroke volume variation and cardiac index during one-lung ventilation: a randomized controlled trial

Affiliations

Goal-directed fluid restriction using stroke volume variation and cardiac index during one-lung ventilation: a randomized controlled trial

Hui Xu et al. J Thorac Dis. 2017 Sep.

Abstract

Background: Goal-directed therapy confers a strong prognosis in patients undergoing major cardiac or noncardiac surgery. The present study investigated whether intraoperative goal-directed fluid restriction (GDFR) using stroke volume variation (SVV) and cardiac index could improve oxygenation and postoperative outcome in patients undergoing one-lung ventilation (OLV).

Methods: A Total of 168 patients scheduled for elective thoracoscopic lobectomy under OLV were randomized into the GDFR protocol (group G) or conventional fluid therapy groups (group C). Patients in group C underwent conventional fluid therapy based on mean arterial pressure (MAP), central venous pressure (CVP), and urine volume, whereas those in group G received GDFR protocol associated with the SVV from 10-13% and the cardiac index was controlled at a minimum of 2.5 L/min/m2. The primary outcome variable was PaO2/FiO2. The secondary outcomes were other pulmonary variables and lung mechanics, inflammatory response, the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications, and the length of hospital stay.

Results: During surgery, the PaO2/FiO2 ratio in group G was more than that of group C at 30 and 60 min after OLV, 10 min after re-expansion, and the end of the operation (259±29 vs. 314±34; 253±30 vs. 308±35; 341±34 vs. 394±39; 349±35 vs. 401±39, respectively, all P<0.001). Compared to conventional fluid therapy, GDFR protocol also significantly improved the hemodynamic and lung mechanics with the initiation of OLV. The incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications such as acute lung injury and pneumonia, and the length of hospital stay were decreased by GDFR protocol as compared to conventional fluid therapy (all P<0.05). However, there were no significant differences between groups with respect to the concentration of serum tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and interleukin-10 (IL-10).

Conclusions: The GDFR protocol based on SVV and cardiac index applied in patients undergoing OLV improves intraoperative pulmonary oxygenation. It can also reduce the postoperative complications and length of hospital stay. However, the GDFR strategy cannot reduce the local or systemic inflammation.

Trial registration: Chinese Clinical Trials Register ChiCTR-INR-16008288, Registered 20 April, 2016.

Keywords: Fluid therapy; lung function; one-lung ventilation (OLV); stroke volume variation (SVV).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Goal-directed fluid therapy protocol. SVV, stroke volume variation; CI, cardiac index; MAP, mean arterial pressure; ∆SV, the increased SV based on colloid treatment.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Flow diagram of enrolled patients.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Variables of lung function and Qs/Qt ratio. (A) PaO2/FiO2; (B) A-aDO2; (C) RI; (D) Qs/Qt ratio. Data are represented as mean ± SD. *, P<0.05 versus T0; #, P<0.05 versus group C. A-aDO2, Alveolar to arterial difference of oxygen tension; RI, Respiratory index; T0, before one-lung ventilation (OLV); T1, 30 min after OLV; T2, 60 min after OLV; T3, 10 min after re-expansion; T4, the end of operation.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Variables of Intraoperative hemodynamic data. (A) HR; (B) MAP; (C) CVP; (D) CI. Data are represented as mean ± SD. *, P<0.05 versus T0; #, P<0.05 versus group C. HR, heart rate; CVP, central venous pressure.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Variables of inflammatory cytokines. (A) TNF-α; (B) IL-6; (C) IL-10. Data are represented as mean ± SD. *, P<0.05 versus T0. TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor-α; IL-6, interleukin-6; IL-10, interleukin-10; T0, before one-lung ventilation (OLV); T4, the end of operation; T5 to T7: 6, 24, 72 h after operation, respectively.

References

    1. Cecconi M, Hofer C, Teboul JL, et al. Fluid challenges in intensive care: the FENICE study: A global inception cohort study. Intensive Care Med 2015;41:1529-37. 10.1007/s00134-015-3850-x - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pearse RM, Harrison DA, MacDonald N, et al. Effect of a perioperative, cardiac output-guided hemodynamic therapy algorithm on outcomes following major gastrointestinal surgery: a randomized clinical trial and systematic review. JAMA 2014;311:2181-90. 10.1001/jama.2014.5305 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Peng K, Li J, Cheng H, et al. Goal-directed fluid therapy based on stroke volume variations improves fluid management and gastrointestinal perfusion in patients undergoing major orthopedic surgery. Med Princ Pract 2014;23:413-20. 10.1159/000363573 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Azhar RA, Bochner B, Catto J, et al. Enhanced Recovery after Urological Surgery: A Contemporary Systematic Review of Outcomes, Key Elements, and Research Needs. Eur Urol 2016;70:176-87. 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.02.051 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Benes J, Giglio M, Brienza N, et al. The effects of goal-directed fluid therapy based on dynamic parameters on post-surgical outcome: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Crit Care 2014;18:584. 10.1186/s13054-014-0584-z - DOI - PMC - PubMed