Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2018 Mar;55(3):792-797.
doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2017.11.028. Epub 2017 Dec 6.

A Comparison of the Accuracy of Clinician Prediction of Survival Versus the Palliative Prognostic Index

Affiliations
Comparative Study

A Comparison of the Accuracy of Clinician Prediction of Survival Versus the Palliative Prognostic Index

Paige Farinholt et al. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2018 Mar.

Abstract

Context: Survival predictions for advanced cancer patients impact many aspects of care, but the accuracy of clinician prediction of survival (CPS) is low. Prognostic tools such as the Palliative Prognostic Index (PPI) have been proposed to improve accuracy of predictions. However, it is not known if PPI is better than CPS at discriminating survival.

Objective: We compared the prognostic accuracy of CPS to PPI in patients with advanced cancer.

Methods: This was a prospective study in which palliative care physicians at our tertiary care cancer center documented both the PPI and CPS in hospitalized patients with advanced cancer. We compared the discrimination of CPS and PPI using concordance statistics, area under the receiver-operating characteristics curve (AUC), net reclassification index, and integrated discrimination improvement for 30-day survival and 100-day survival.

Results: Two hundred fifteen patients were enrolled with a median survival of 109 days and a median follow-up of 239 days. The AUC for 30-day survival was 0.76 (95% CI 0.66-0.85) for PPI and 0.58 (95% CI 0.47-0.68) for CPS (P < 0.0001). Using the net reclassification index, 67% of patients were correctly reclassified using PPI instead of CPS for 30-day survival (P = 0.0005). CPS and PPI had similar accuracy for 100-day survival (AUC 0.62 vs. 0.64; P = 0.58).

Conclusion: We found that PPI was more accurate than CPS when used to discriminate survival at 30 days, but not at 100 days. This study highlights the reason and timing for using PPI to facilitate survival predictions.

Keywords: Clinical prediction rule; forecasting; neoplasms; prognosis; statistical data analysis; survival.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest disclosure: The funding sources were not involved in the design and conduct of the study; the collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; or the preparation, review, and approval of the manuscript. The authors declare there is no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Discrimination of CPS and PPI score
These receiver-operating characteristics curves plot sensitivity vs. 1-specificity for (A) 30-day survival and (B) 100-day survival. PPI has larger area under the curve and thus better performance compared to CPS.

References

    1. Hui D, Con A, Christie G, Hawley PH. Goals of Care and End-of-Life Decision Making for Hospitalized Patients at a Canadian Tertiary Care Cancer Center. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2009;38:871–81. - PubMed
    1. Hui D. Prognostication of survival in patients with advanced cancer: Predicting the unpredictable? Cancer Control. 2015;22:489–97. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Milnes S, Corke C, Orford NR, Bailey M, Savulescu J, Wilkinson D. Patient values informing medical treatment: a pilot community and advance care planning survey. BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2017 bmjspcare-2016-001177. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cook C. Is clinical gestalt good enough? J Man Manip Ther. 2009;17:6–7. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Perez-Cruz PE, Dos Santos R, Silva TB, Crovador CS, Nascimento MSDA, Hall S, et al. Longitudinal temporal and probabilistic prediction of survival in a cohort of patients with advanced cancer. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2014;48:875–82. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types