Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Dec 8;5(4):e50.
doi: 10.2196/medinform.8207.

Examining Tensions That Affect the Evaluation of Technology in Health Care: Considerations for System Decision Makers From the Perspective of Industry and Evaluators

Laura Desveaux  1   2 , James Shaw  1   2 , Ross Wallace  1   3 , Onil Bhattacharyya  1   2   4 , R Sacha Bhatia  1   2   5 , Trevor Jamieson  1   5   6
Affiliations

Examining Tensions That Affect the Evaluation of Technology in Health Care: Considerations for System Decision Makers From the Perspective of Industry and Evaluators

Laura Desveaux et al. JMIR Med Inform. .

Abstract

Virtual technologies have the potential to mitigate a range of challenges for health care systems. Despite the widespread use of mobile devices in everyday life, they currently have a limited role in health service delivery and clinical care. Efforts to integrate the fast-paced consumer technology market with health care delivery exposes tensions among patients, providers, vendors, evaluators, and system decision makers. This paper explores the key tensions between the high bar for evidence prior to market approval that guides health care regulatory decisions and the "fail fast" reality of the technology industry. We examine three core tensions: balancing user needs versus system needs, rigor versus responsiveness, and the role of pre- versus postmarket evidence generation. We use these to elaborate on the structure and appropriateness of evaluation mechanisms for virtual care solutions. Virtual technologies provide a foundation for personalized, patient-centered medicine on the user side, coupled with a broader understanding of impact on the system side. However, mechanisms for stakeholder discussion are needed to clarify the nature of the health technology marketplace and the drivers of evaluation priorities.

Keywords: evaluation; healthcare; policy; technology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

References

    1. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development . Fiscal Sustainability of Health Systems: Bridging Health and Finance Perspectives. Paris, France: OECD Publishing; 2015. Sep 25, pp. 1–264.
    1. Canadian Institute for Health Information . How Canada Compares: Results From The Commonwealth Fund 2015 International Health Policy Survey of Older Adults. Ottawa, ON: CIHI; 2016. Jan, [2017-12-01]. https://www.cihi.ca/sites/default/files/document/commonwealth_fund_2015_... 6vODAJozN.
    1. Osborn R, Moulds D, Schneider EC, Doty MM, Squires D, Sarnak DO. Primary Care Physicians In Ten Countries Report Challenges Caring For Patients With Complex Health Needs. Health Aff (Millwood) 2015 Dec;34(12):2104–2112. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.1018. - DOI - PubMed
    1. van der Eijk M, Nijhuis FAP, Faber MJ, Bloem BR. Moving from physician-centered care towards patient-centered care for Parkinson's disease patients. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2013 Nov;19(11):923–927. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2013.04.022. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lyerly MJ, Wu T, Mullen MT, Albright KC, Wolff C, Boehme AK, Branas CC, Grotta JC, Savitz SI, Carr BG. The effects of telemedicine on racial and ethnic disparities in access to acute stroke care. J Telemed Telecare. 2016 Mar;22(2):114–120. doi: 10.1177/1357633X15589534. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/26116854 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources