Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jan 31;84(4):e02000-17.
doi: 10.1128/AEM.02000-17. Print 2018 Feb 15.

Occurrence, Persistence, and Contamination Routes of Listeria monocytogenes Genotypes on Three Finnish Dairy Cattle Farms: a Longitudinal Study

Affiliations

Occurrence, Persistence, and Contamination Routes of Listeria monocytogenes Genotypes on Three Finnish Dairy Cattle Farms: a Longitudinal Study

Hanna Castro et al. Appl Environ Microbiol. .

Abstract

The molecular epidemiology of Listeria monocytogenes was investigated in a longitudinal study of three Finnish dairy farms during 2013 to 2016. A total of 186 bulk tank milk (BTM), 224 milk filter sock (MFS), and 1,702 barn environment samples were analyzed, and isolates of L. monocytogenes were genotyped using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. L. monocytogenes occurred throughout the year in all sample types, and the prevalence in MFS increased significantly during the indoor season. L. monocytogenes was more prevalent in MFS (29%) than in BTM (13%) samples. However, the prevalence of L. monocytogenes varied more between farms in samples of MFS (13 to 48%) than in BTM (10 to 16%). For each farm, the L. monocytogenes genotypes detected were classified by persistence (defined as persistent if isolated from ≥3 samples during ≥6 months) and predominance (defined as predominant if >5% prevalence on at least one farm visit). The prevalence of sporadic genotypes was 4 to 5% on all three farms. In contrast, the prevalence of persistent predominant genotypes varied between farms by 4% to 16%. The highest prevalence of persistent predominant genotypes was observed on the farm with the poorest production hygiene. Persistent predominant genotypes were most prevalent on feeding surfaces, water troughs, and floors. Genotypes isolated from the milking system or from cow udders had a greater relative risk of occurring in BTM and MFS than genotypes that only occurred elsewhere in the farm, supporting the hypothesis that L. monocytogenes is transmitted to milk from contamination on the udder surface or in the milking equipment.IMPORTANCEListeria monocytogenes is a ubiquitous environmental bacterium and the causative agent of a serious foodborne illness, listeriosis. Dairy products are common vehicles of listeriosis, and dairy cattle farms harbor L. monocytogenes genotypes associated with human listeriosis outbreaks. Indeed, dairy cattle farms act as a reservoir of L. monocytogenes, and the organism is frequently detected in bulk tank milk (BTM) and in the feces of clinically healthy cows. The ecology of L. monocytogenes in the farm environment is complex and poorly understood. Isolates of the same L. monocytogenes genotype can occur in the farm for years, but the factors contributing to the persistence of genotypes on dairy farms are unknown. Knowledge of the persistence patterns and contamination routes of L. monocytogenes on dairy farms can improve management of the contamination pressure in the farm environment and aid in the development of focused control strategies to reduce BTM contamination.

Keywords: food safety; listeriosis; milk hygiene; molecular epidemiology; persistence.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG 1
FIG 1
Similarity analysis of 74 L. monocytogenes genotypes (GT) isolated from three dairy farms, F(A) to F(C), obtained by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) using restriction enzymes ApaI and AscI. Similarity analysis of the combined ApaI and AscI fingerprint profiles was performed with the unweighted pair group method with average linkages (UPGMA), using the Dice coefficient with a 1.5% position tolerance limit and 1% optimization. Serogroups (SG) were determined by PCR. For each farm, the prevalence pattern of the genotype is designated either “−” (not detected), “S” (sporadic), “P” (persistent nonpredominant), “D” (nonpersistent predominant), or “PD” (persistent predominant), followed by the number of positive samples in parentheses.
FIG 2
FIG 2
Model for L. monocytogenes circulation in the dairy farm environment. The ingestion of contaminated feeds (1) can lead to the dissemination of L. monocytogenes in cattle feces (2) into the barn environment (3). The persistence of L. monocytogenes on the feeding surfaces (4), water troughs, floors, or bedding (3) can prolong the exposure of cattle to L. monocytogenes, facilitating reinfection and further dissemination. Environmental or fecal contamination of the udder surface (5) or L. monocytogenes biofilms nested in the milking system (6) may lead to contamination of the milk filter socks (MFS; 7) and, eventually, the bulk tank milk (BTM; 8).

References

    1. Hoffmann S, Batz MB, Morris JG Jr. 2012. Annual cost of illness and quality-adjusted life year losses in the United States due to 14 foodborne pathogens. J Food Prot 75:1292–1302. doi:10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-11-417. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). 2013. Vital signs: Listeria illnesses, deaths, and outbreaks—United States, 2009–2011. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 62:448–452. - PMC - PubMed
    1. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). 2016. EU summary report on trends and sources of zoonoses, zoonotic agents and food-borne outbreaks in 2015. EFSA J 14:4634. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2016.4634. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lundén J, Tolvanen R, Korkeala H. 2004. Human listeriosis outbreaks linked to dairy products in Europe. J Dairy Sci 87:E6–E12. doi:10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(04)70056-9. - DOI
    1. Cartwright EJ, Jackson KA, Johnson SD, Graves LM, Silk BJ, Mahon BE. 2013. Listeriosis outbreaks and associated food vehicles, United States, 1998–2008. Emerg Infect Dis 19:1–9. doi:10.3201/eid1901.120393. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms