Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Dec 8;2017(1):508-517.
doi: 10.1182/asheducation-2017.1.508.

Management of multiple myeloma in the relapsed/refractory patient

Affiliations
Review

Management of multiple myeloma in the relapsed/refractory patient

Pieter Sonneveld. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. .

Abstract

The approach to the patient with relapsed or relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma requires a careful evaluation of the results of previous treatments, the toxicities associated with it, and an assessment of prognostic factors. The majority of patients will have received prior therapy with drug combinations, including a proteasome inhibitor and an immune-modulatory agent. It is the physician's task to choose the right moment for the start of therapy and decide with the patient which goals need to be achieved. The choice of regimen is usually based on prior response, drugs already received, adverse effects, comorbidities of the patient, and expected efficacy and tolerability. Many double and triple drug combinations are available. In addition, promising new drugs such as pomalidomide, carfilzomib, and monoclonal antibodies are or will be available shortly, and other options can be explored in clinical trials. Finally, supportive care and palliative options need to be considered in later relapsed disease. Increasingly, it becomes important to consider the therapeutic options for the whole duration of the disease and integrate a systematic approach for the patient.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict-of-interest disclosure: The author has consulted for and received honoraria from Celgene Corporation, Amgen, Janssen, Karyopharm, and Skyline.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Global strategy for treatment at relapse.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
European Society for Medical Oncology guidelines 2017 for treatment of relapsed/refractory MM. Source: P. Moreau et al. Multiple myeloma: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up, Annals of Oncology 2017;28(suppl 4):iv52–iv61; doi:10.1093/annonc/mdx096. Reproduced with permission of Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology. Please visit: www.esmo.org.

References

    1. Anderson KC, Kyle RA, Rajkumar SV, Stewart AK, Weber D, Richardson P; ASH/FDA Panel on Clinical Endpoints in Multiple Myeloma. Clinically relevant end points and new drug approvals for myeloma. Leukemia. 2008;22(2):231-239. - PubMed
    1. Palumbo A, Rajkumar SV, San Miguel JF, et al. . International Myeloma Working Group consensus statement for the management, treatment, and supportive care of patients with myeloma not eligible for standard autologous stem-cell transplantation. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(6):587-600. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ludwig H, Sonneveld P, Davies F, et al. . European perspective on multiple myeloma treatment strategies in 2014. Oncologist. 2014;19(8):829-844. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Harousseau JL, Attal M. How I treat first relapse of myeloma. Blood. 2017;130(8):963-973. - PubMed
    1. Moreau P, Cavo M, Sonneveld P, et al. . Combination of international scoring system 3, high lactate dehydrogenase, and t(4;14) and/or del(17p) identifies patients with multiple myeloma (MM) treated with front-line autologous stem-cell transplantation at high risk of early MM progression-related death. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(20):2173-2180. - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms