Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Mar:78:228-230.
doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2017.11.043. Epub 2017 Nov 29.

The intersection between response inhibition and substance use among adolescents

Affiliations
Review

The intersection between response inhibition and substance use among adolescents

Kristine Rømer Thomsen et al. Addict Behav. 2018 Mar.

Abstract

Problems related to the capacity to successfully engage response inhibition are considered a risk factor for the development of substance use disorders (SUDs), but the evidence has been predominantly cross-sectional. In this commentary, we argue that recent longitudinal studies with multi-modal measures of response inhibition can improve understanding of how response inhibition may intersect with substance use among adolescents. Most Stop-Signal studies suggest that slower response inhibition predicts substance use progressions, with one multi-site study showing greater fronto-parietal activity indicative of risk. Most Go-NoGo studies suggest that blunted activation of prefrontal cortical areas during response inhibition predicts substance use progressions, while commission errors are less effective in identifying adolescents at risk. Studies differ in subject populations, outcome measures, statistical methods, and BOLD response contrasts, which challenge the capacity to compare and generalize findings. We encourage research teams throughout the globe to undertake multi-modal, longitudinal studies to assess brain functioning with large sample sizes, and when possible, before significant substance use potentially obscures interpretation of findings. Systematic review and meta-analysis of this growing literature are also important goals for future research.

Keywords: Adolescents; Longitudinal; Response inhibition; Risk factors; Substance use; fMRI.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest

All authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Anokhin AP, Golosheykin S. Neural Correlates of Response Inhibition in Adolescents Prospectively Predict Regular Tobacco Smoking. Developmental Neuropsychology. 2016;41(1–2):22–37. doi: 10.1080/87565641.2016.1195833. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bo R, Billieux J, Gjerde LC, Eilertsen EM, Landro NI. Do Executive Functions Predict Binge-Drinking Patterns? Evidence from a Longitudinal Study in Young Adulthood. Front Psychol. 2017;8:489. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00489. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Caswell AJ, Bond R, Duka T, Morgan MJ. Further evidence of the heterogeneous nature of impulsivity. Pers Individ Dif. 2015;76:68–74. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2014.11.059. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Everitt BJ. Neural and psychological mechanisms underlying compulsive drug seeking habits and drug memories–indications for novel treatments of addiction. Eur J Neurosci. 2014;40(1):2163–2182. doi: 10.1111/ejn.12644. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Everitt BJ, Robbins TW. Neural systems of reinforcement for drug addiction: from actions to habits to compulsion. Nat Neurosci. 2005;8(11):1481–1489. doi: 10.1038/nn1579. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms