Lower complication rate and faster return to sports in patients with acute syndesmotic rupture treated with a new knotless suture button device
- PMID: 29224059
- DOI: 10.1007/s00167-017-4820-3
Lower complication rate and faster return to sports in patients with acute syndesmotic rupture treated with a new knotless suture button device
Abstract
Purpose: Suture button devices for tibiofibular syndesmosis injuries provide semirigid dynamic stabilization, but complications including knot irritation have been reported. No randomized trials of the new knotless suture button devices have been performed. We hypothesized that knotless suture button devices eliminate knot irritation and facilitate quicker return to sports. This study was performed to compare the clinical outcomes, complication rates, and time to return to sports between a new knotless suture button device and syndesmotic screw fixation.
Methods: This study included 54 patients treated for ankle syndesmotic injury from 2012 to 2014 with a knotless suture button device or syndesmotic screw fixation. Clinical outcomes were measured using the American Orthopaedics Foot and Ankle Society score, Foot and Ankle Disability Index, Olerud and Molander score, and visual analog scale for pain and function. Secondary outcome measures were the complication rate and time required to return to sports. Patients underwent clinical and radiological evaluations preoperatively and three times during the 1-year postoperative follow-up.
Results: 54 of 62 eligible patients were analyzed, median age 37 (18-60) and underwent the 1-year follow-up. The screw fixation and knotless suture button groups comprised 26 and 28 patients, respectively. The complication rate was significantly lower (p = 0.03) and time to return to sports was significantly shorter in the knotless suture button than screw fixation group (average, 14 versus 19 weeks, respectively; p = 0.006). No significant differences were identified in clinical outcomes or visual analog scale scores for pain and function between the groups. Age, injury mechanism, and body mass index did not significantly affect the time required to return to sports activities. The type of fixation was the only independent variable that reached statistical significance (p = 0.006).
Conclusion: Syndesmotic screw fixation and the new knotless suture button device both resulted in good clinical results. Lower complication rate and the earlier time to return to sports make the new knotless suture button device recommendable especially for highly active patients.
Level of evidence: Randomized controlled trial, Level I.
Keywords: Ankle syndesmosis; Complication rate; Functional outcome; Knotless suture button device; Syndesmotic screw; Time to return to sports.
Similar articles
-
A systematic review of suture-button versus syndesmotic screw in the treatment of distal tibiofibular syndesmosis injury.BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 Jul 4;18(1):286. doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1645-7. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017. PMID: 28676078 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of suture button fixation and syndesmotic screw fixation in the treatment of distal tibiofibular syndesmosis injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Int J Surg. 2018 Dec;60:120-131. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.11.007. Epub 2018 Nov 12. Int J Surg. 2018. PMID: 30439535
-
Arthroscopically measured syndesmotic stability after screw vs. suture button fixation in a cadaveric model.Injury. 2017 Nov;48(11):2433-2437. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2017.08.066. Epub 2017 Aug 31. Injury. 2017. PMID: 28899558
-
The Clinical Efficacy of Suture-Button Fixation and Trans-Syndesmotic Screw Fixation in the Treatment of Ankle Fracture Combined With Distal Tibiofibular Syndesmosis Injury: A Retrospective Study.J Foot Ankle Surg. 2022 Jan-Feb;61(1):143-148. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2021.07.009. Epub 2021 Jul 20. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2022. PMID: 34404589
-
Randomized trial comparing suture button with single 3.5 mm syndesmotic screw for ankle syndesmosis injury: similar results at 2 years.Acta Orthop. 2020 Dec;91(6):770-775. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2020.1818175. Epub 2020 Sep 10. Acta Orthop. 2020. PMID: 32907456 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Cited by
-
Comparison of tendon suture fixation and cortical screw fixation for treatment of distal tibiofibular syndesmosis injury: A case-control study.Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Aug 21;99(34):e21573. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000021573. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020. PMID: 32846766 Free PMC article.
-
Current management of trimalleolar ankle fractures.EFORT Open Rev. 2021 Aug 10;6(8):692-703. doi: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.200138. eCollection 2021 Aug. EFORT Open Rev. 2021. PMID: 34532077 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The Impact of Suture Button Removal in Syndesmosis Fixation.J Clin Med. 2021 Aug 21;10(16):3726. doi: 10.3390/jcm10163726. J Clin Med. 2021. PMID: 34442022 Free PMC article.
-
Dynamic fixation is superior in terms of clinical outcomes to static fixation in managing distal tibiofibular syndesmosis injury.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020 Jan;28(1):270-280. doi: 10.1007/s00167-019-05659-0. Epub 2019 Aug 17. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020. PMID: 31422424
-
Value of Intraoperative 3D Imaging on the Quality of Reduction of the Distal Tibiofibular Joint When Using a Suture-Button System.Foot Ankle Int. 2023 Jan;44(1):54-61. doi: 10.1177/10711007221138775. Epub 2022 Dec 20. Foot Ankle Int. 2023. PMID: 36537750 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials