Just-in-time consent: The ethical case for an alternative to traditional informed consent in randomized trials comparing an experimental intervention with usual care
- PMID: 29224379
- PMCID: PMC5799028
- DOI: 10.1177/1740774517746610
Just-in-time consent: The ethical case for an alternative to traditional informed consent in randomized trials comparing an experimental intervention with usual care
Abstract
Informed consent for randomized trials often causes significant and persistent anxiety, distress and confusion to patients. Where an experimental treatment is compared to a standard care control, much of this burden is potentially avoidable in the control group. We propose a "just-in-time" consent in which consent discussions take place in two stages: an initial consent to research from all participants and a later specific consent to randomized treatment only from those assigned to the experimental intervention. All patients are first approached and informed about research procedures, such as questionnaires or tests. They are also informed that they might be randomly selected to receive an experimental treatment and that, if selected, they can learn more about the treatment and decide whether or not to accept it at that time. After randomization, control patients undergo standard clinical consent whereas patients randomized to the experimental procedure undergo a second consent discussion. Analysis would be by intent-to-treat, which protects the trial from selection bias, although not from poor acceptance of experimental treatment. The advantages of just-in-time consent stem from the fact that only patients randomized to the experimental treatment are subject to a discussion of that intervention. We hypothesize that this will reduce much of the patient's burden associated with the consent process, such as decisional anxiety, confusion and information overload. We recommend well-controlled studies to compare just-in-time and traditional consent, with endpoints to include characteristics of participants, distress and anxiety and participants' understanding of research procedures.
Keywords: Randomized controlled trials; anxiety; decisional burden; decisional conflict; informed consent; pragmatic trials.
Conflict of interest statement
The Authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
Comment in
-
Rejoinder.Clin Trials. 2018 Feb;15(1):25-26. doi: 10.1177/1740774517746638. Epub 2017 Dec 7. Clin Trials. 2018. PMID: 29214850 No abstract available.
-
Innovative approaches to informed consent for randomized clinical trials: Identifying the ethical challenges.Clin Trials. 2018 Feb;15(1):17-20. doi: 10.1177/1740774517746621. Epub 2017 Dec 17. Clin Trials. 2018. PMID: 29250988 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
TwiC or treat? Are trials within cohorts ethically defensible?Clin Trials. 2018 Feb;15(1):21-24. doi: 10.1177/1740774517746622. Epub 2017 Dec 17. Clin Trials. 2018. PMID: 29250989 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Comment on Vickers et al.Clin Trials. 2019 Apr;16(2):214-215. doi: 10.1177/1740774518806868. Epub 2018 Oct 13. Clin Trials. 2019. PMID: 30317868 No abstract available.
-
Response to Chappell.Clin Trials. 2019 Apr;16(2):216. doi: 10.1177/1740774518820530. Epub 2018 Dec 19. Clin Trials. 2019. PMID: 30563372 No abstract available.
-
'Time out'-more transparency is required in 'Just-in-time' consent.Eur J Intern Med. 2023 Feb;108:100-101. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2022.11.031. Epub 2022 Nov 29. Eur J Intern Med. 2023. PMID: 36460540 No abstract available.
References
-
- Kvaal K, Ulstein I, Nordhus IH, Engedal K. The Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI): the state scale in detecting mental disorders in geriatric patients. International journal of geriatric psychiatry. 2005;20:629–34. - PubMed
-
- Aaronson NK, Visser-Pol E, Leenhouts GH, et al. Telephone-based nursing intervention improves the effectiveness of the informed consent process in cancer clinical trials. Journal of clinical oncology: official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. 1996;14:984–96. - PubMed
-
- Coyne CA, Xu R, Raich P, et al. Randomized, controlled trial of an easy-to-read informed consent statement for clinical trial participation: a study of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. 2003;21:836–42. - PubMed
-
- World Medical Association. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA. 2013;310:2191–2194. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
