Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Nov 27;9(11):215-223.
doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v9.i11.215.

Laparoscopic complete mesocolic excisions for colonic cancer in the last decade: Five-year survival in a single centre

Affiliations

Laparoscopic complete mesocolic excisions for colonic cancer in the last decade: Five-year survival in a single centre

Kristian Eeg Storli et al. World J Gastrointest Surg. .

Abstract

Aim: To analyse clinical and long-term oncologic results after laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision (CME) for colonic cancer over a 10-year period.

Methods: Consecutive patients who received laparoscopic CME at our hospital from 2007 to 2017 were prospectively registered and retrospectively analysed. In total, 341 patients were included with tumour-nodal-metastasis (TNM) stages 0-III.

Results: The mean age of the patients was 71.9 years. The median length of stay was 5 d. The mean lymph node harvest was 17.8. The mortality rate was 1.2%. Fifteen patients were reoperated on for anastomotic leaks. The local recurrence rate was 2.3%. Five-year TTR and cancer-specific survival CSS were 83.1% and 90.3%. The location of the tumour was not a significant variable for survival in unadjusted and adjusted survival analysis. TNM stage and anastomotic leaks were significant variables with respect to survival.

Conclusion: Laparoscopic CME results in acceptable complication rates and long-term oncologic results. It is important to avoid anastomotic leaks because of their negative effect on survival.

Keywords: Cancer specific survival; Central vascular ligature; Colonic cancer; Complete mesocolic excision; Laparoscopic surgery; Time to recurrence.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict-of-interest statement: The authors of this manuscript have no conflict- of- interest to disclose.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Time to recurrence shown according to resection type for 341 patients with colonic cancer operated on with laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision in a Norwegian community teaching hospital during 2007-2017 (P = NS).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Cancer-specific survival shown according to resection type for 341 patients with colonic cancer operated on with laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision in a Norwegian community teaching hospital during 2007-2017 (P = NS).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Time to recurrence shown according to reoperation for anastomotic leak for 341 patients with colonic cancer operated on with laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision in a Norwegian community teaching hospital during 2007-2017 (P = 0.037).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Time to recurrence and anastomotic leakage. A: Survival curves for time to recurrence (TTR) from a Cox regression model for patients with right colonic cancer operated on with laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision (CME) in a Norwegian community teaching hospital during 2007-2015 with or without an anastomotic leak (P = 0.037); B: TTR shown as Cox regression curves for patients with right flexure or right proximal transverse colonic cancer operated on with laparoscopic CME in a Norwegian community teaching hospital during 2007-2015 with or without an anastomotic leak (P = 0.037); C: TTR shown as Cox regression curves for patients with left transverse, left flexure or descending colon cancer operated on with laparoscopic CME in a Norwegian community teaching hospital during 2007-2015 with or without an anastomotic leak (P = 0.037); D: TTR shown as Cox regression curves for patients with sigmoid or recto-sigmoid colon cancer operated on with laparoscopic CME in a Norwegian community teaching hospital during 2007-2015 with or without an anastomotic leak (P = 0.037).
Figure 5
Figure 5
Cancer-specific survival shown according to reoperation for anastomotic leak for 341 patients with colonic cancer operated on with laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision in a Norwegian community teaching hospital during 2007-2017 (P = 0.023).

References

    1. Hohenberger W, Reingruber B, Merkel S. Surgery for colon cancer. Scand J Surg. 2003;92:45–52. - PubMed
    1. Hohenberger W, Weber K, Matzel K, Papadopoulos T, Merkel S. Standardized surgery for colonic cancer: complete mesocolic excision and central ligation--technical notes and outcome. Colorectal Dis. 2009;11:354–364; discussion 364-365. - PubMed
    1. Yamamoto S, Inomata M, Katayama H, Mizusawa J, Etoh T, Konishi F, Sugihara K, Watanabe M, Moriya Y, Kitano S; Japan Clinical Oncology Group Colorectal Cancer Study Group. Short-term surgical outcomes from a randomized controlled trial to evaluate laparoscopic and open D3 dissection for stage II/III colon cancer: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study JCOG 0404. Ann Surg. 2014;260:23–30. - PubMed
    1. West NP, Kobayashi H, Takahashi K, Perrakis A, Weber K, Hohenberger W, Sugihara K, Quirke P. Understanding optimal colonic cancer surgery: comparison of Japanese D3 resection and European complete mesocolic excision with central vascular ligation. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:1763–1769. - PubMed
    1. Søndenaa K, Quirke P, Hohenberger W, Sugihara K, Kobayashi H, Kessler H, Brown G, Tudyka V, D’Hoore A, Kennedy RH, et al. The rationale behind complete mesocolic excision (CME) and a central vascular ligation for colon cancer in open and laparoscopic surgery: proceedings of a consensus conference. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2014;29:419–428. - PubMed