Optimizing hemodynamics of transcatheter aortic valve-in-valve implantation in 19-mm surgical aortic prostheses
- PMID: 29226506
- DOI: 10.1002/ccd.27415
Optimizing hemodynamics of transcatheter aortic valve-in-valve implantation in 19-mm surgical aortic prostheses
Abstract
Objective: To demonstrate the feasibility of achieving good hemodynamic results with valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement (ViV TAVR) for degenerated 19 mm surgical bioprosthetic valves.
Background: Considerable controversy exists regarding ViV TAVR within 19mm surgical prostheses due to concerns of elevated valve gradients and mortality.
Methods: Among all patient undergoing ViV TAVR between 7/2016 and 4/2017 for symptomatic severe bioprosthetic aortic stenosis (AS), five had a 19 mm surgical valve in place and were included in this publication. None of the patients had patient-prosthesis mismatch. Aggressive post-dilation was performed in four out of five cases using a special technique we describe below.
Results: In all cases, mean aortic valve (AV) gradients significantly improved post-ViV TAVR, particularly after post-dilation. Interestingly, high pressure post-dilation of the ViV resulted in an increase in the diameter of surgical valve stent frame dimensions in nearly all patients who underwent post-dilation.
Conclusions: Good hemodynamic outcome is possible with aggressive post-dilation in patients with 19 mm failed surgical bioprostheses. High-risk patients with 19 mm failed surgical prostheses who do not otherwise have viable surgical options should be considered for ViV TAVR.
Keywords: 19 mm; TAVR; bioprosthetic aortic valve; valve-in-valve.
© 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Comment in
-
"Expanding the frame" for valve-in-valve therapy in small bioprostheses: Encouraging signs for the road ahead.Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Sep 1;92(3):555-556. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27801. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018. PMID: 30312998
Similar articles
-
Bioprosthetic Valve Fracture Improves the Hemodynamic Results of Valve-in-Valve Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Jul;10(7):e005216. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.117.005216. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2017. PMID: 28698291
-
Transcatheter Replacement of Failed Bioprosthetic Valves: Large Multicenter Assessment of the Effect of Implantation Depth on Hemodynamics After Aortic Valve-in-Valve.Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Jun;9(6):e003651. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.115.003651. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2016. PMID: 27301396
-
Outcomes Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement for Degenerative Stentless Versus Stented Bioprostheses.JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Jul 8;12(13):1256-1263. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.02.036. Epub 2019 Jun 12. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019. PMID: 31202944
-
Transcatheter Aortic Valve-in-Valve Procedure in Patients with Bioprosthetic Structural Valve Deterioration.Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J. 2017 Jul-Sep;13(3):132-141. doi: 10.14797/mdcj-13-3-132. Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J. 2017. PMID: 29743998 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Transcatheter valve-in-valve versus redo surgical aortic valve replacement for the treatment of degenerated bioprosthetic aortic valve: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Dec 1;92(7):1404-1411. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27686. Epub 2018 Jul 19. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018. PMID: 30024102
Cited by
-
Hemodynamic outcomes after valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a single-center experience.Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2021 Sep;10(5):630-640. doi: 10.21037/acs-2021-tviv-131. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2021. PMID: 34733690 Free PMC article.
-
Long-Term Results (up to 20 Years) of 19 mm or Smaller Prostheses in the Aortic Position. Does Size Matter? A Propensity-Matched Survival Analysis.J Clin Med. 2021 May 11;10(10):2055. doi: 10.3390/jcm10102055. J Clin Med. 2021. PMID: 34064845 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials