Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Feb;13(1):61-73.
doi: 10.1177/1556264617744121. Epub 2017 Dec 10.

Examining Data Repository Guidelines for Qualitative Data Sharing

Alison L Antes  1 , Heidi A Walsh  1 , Michelle Strait  1 , Cynthia R Hudson-Vitale  2 , James M DuBois  1
Affiliations

Examining Data Repository Guidelines for Qualitative Data Sharing

Alison L Antes et al. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2018 Feb.

Abstract

Qualitative data provide rich information on research questions in diverse fields. Recent calls for increased transparency and openness in research emphasize data sharing. However, qualitative data sharing has yet to become the norm internationally and is particularly uncommon in the United States. Guidance for archiving and secondary use of qualitative data is required for progress in this regard. In this study, we review the benefits and concerns associated with qualitative data sharing and then describe the results of a content analysis of guidelines from international repositories that archive qualitative data. A minority of repositories provide qualitative data sharing guidelines. Of the guidelines available, there is substantial variation in whether specific topics are addressed. Some topics, such as removing direct identifiers, are consistently addressed, while others, such as providing an anonymization log, are not. We discuss the implications of our study for education, best practices, and future research.

Keywords: data archiving; data repositories; data sharing; qualitative data; qualitative research; research ethics; secondary data use.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Repository Inclusion Search Strategy
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Australian Data Archive (ADA) Australian Data Archive. 2016 Retrieved from https://www.ada.edu.au/ada/about.
    1. Australian National Data Service. Ethics, consent and data sharing. 2016 Retrieved from http://ands.org.au/guides/ethics-consent-and-data-sharing.
    1. Begley CG, Ellis LM. Raise standards for preclinical cancer research. Nature. 2012;531:531–533. - PubMed
    1. Broom A, Cheshire L, Emmison M. Qualitative researchers’ understandings of their practice and the implications for data archiving and sharing. Sociology. 2009;43(6):1163–1180.
    1. Center for Open Science. The Transparency and Openness Promotion Guidelines. n.d Retrieved from https://cos.io/top/

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources