Patients with acute myocardial infarction and non-obstructive coronary arteries: safety and prognostic relevance of invasive coronary provocative tests
- PMID: 29228159
- DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx667
Patients with acute myocardial infarction and non-obstructive coronary arteries: safety and prognostic relevance of invasive coronary provocative tests
Abstract
Aims: Functional alterations of epicardial coronary arteries or coronary microcirculation represent a frequent cause of myocardial infarction and non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA). We aimed at assessing the prognostic value of intracoronary provocative tests in patients presenting with MINOCA and in which other causes of MINOCA have been excluded.
Methods and results: We prospectively evaluated patients with a diagnosis of MINOCA, excluding patients with aetiologies other than suspected coronary vasomotor abnormalities. Immediately after coronary angiography, an invasive provocative test using acetylcholine or ergonovine was performed. The incidence of death from any cause, cardiac death, and recurrence of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) was assessed at follow-up. We also assessed angina status using Seattle Angina Questionnaires (SAQ). We enrolled 80 consecutive patients [mean age 63.0 ± 10.7 years, 40 (50%) male]. Provocative test was positive in 37 (46.2%) patients without any complication. Among patients with a positive test, epicardial spasm was detected in 24 (64.9%) patients and microvascular spasm in 13 (35.1%) patients. After a median follow-up of 36.0 (range 12.0-60.0) months, patients with a positive test had a significantly higher occurrence of death from any cause [12 (32.4%) vs. 2 (4.7%); P = 0.002], cardiac death [7 (18.9%) vs. 0 (0.0%); P = 0.005], and readmission for ACS [10 (27.0%) vs. 3 (7.0%); P = 0.015] as well as a worse angina status as assessed by SAQ [Seattle score: 88.0 (33.0-100.0) vs. 100.0 (44.0-100.0); P = 0.001] when compared with patients with a negative test.
Conclusions: We demonstrate that in patients presenting with MINOCA and suspected coronary vasomotor abnormalities, a positive provocative test for spasm is safe and identifies a high-risk subset of patients.
Keywords: Invasive provocative test; MINOCA; Prognosis; Vasospasm.
Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author 2017. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Comment in
- 
  
  Provocative tests for coronary artery spasm in MINOCA: necessary and safe?Eur Heart J. 2018 Jan 7;39(2):99-101. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx737. Eur Heart J. 2018. PMID: 29309560 No abstract available.
- 
  
  Is invasive coronary provocation testing cost-effective among MINOCA patients?Eur Heart J. 2018 Sep 14;39(35):3334. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy304. Eur Heart J. 2018. PMID: 29850802 No abstract available.
- 
  
  Personalized treatment of myocardial infarction and non-obstructive coronary arteries: an unmet need in a high-risk population.Eur Heart J. 2018 Sep 14;39(35):3335. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy305. Eur Heart J. 2018. PMID: 29850804 No abstract available.
- 
  
  Type 2 myocardial infarction.Eur Heart J. 2018 Nov 7;39(42):3825. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy535. Eur Heart J. 2018. PMID: 30202932 No abstract available.
- 
  
  Reconsidering aetiologies of type 2 myocardial infarction: when a classification is a simplistic approach for a complex reality.Eur Heart J. 2018 Nov 7;39(42):3826. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy537. Eur Heart J. 2018. PMID: 30203043 No abstract available.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
- Full Text Sources
- Other Literature Sources
- Medical
 
        