Comparison of Neoadjuvant Nab-Paclitaxel+Carboplatin vs Nab-Paclitaxel+Gemcitabine in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Randomized WSG-ADAPT-TN Trial Results
- PMID: 29228315
- DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djx258
Comparison of Neoadjuvant Nab-Paclitaxel+Carboplatin vs Nab-Paclitaxel+Gemcitabine in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Randomized WSG-ADAPT-TN Trial Results
Abstract
Background: Pathological complete response (pCR) is associated with improved prognosis in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). The optimal chemotherapy regimen is unclear. Weekly nab-paclitaxel vs conventional paclitaxel or addition of carboplatin to anthracycline-taxane results in higher pCR rates with uncertain survival impact. We evaluated carboplatin vs gemcitabine with a nab-paclitaxel backbone as a short 12-week A-free regimen with a focus on early response.
Methods: Patients with TNBC (estrogen receptor/progesterone receptor < 1%, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative, cT1c-cT4c, cN0/+) were randomly assigned to A: nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m2/gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 d1,8 three times weekly (q3w); vs B: nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m2/carboplatin AUC2 day 1,8 q3w. The trial was powered for a pCR (ypT0/is ypN0) comparison by therapy arm and early response (defined as Ki-67 decrease >30% or < 500 invasive tumor cells in the three-week serial biopsy). All statistical tests were two-sided.
Results: A total of 336 patients were enrolled (48 centers, arms A/B: n = 182/154). The median age was 50 years. At baseline (A vs B), 62.6% and 62.9% had cT2-4c tumors; 86.8% and 90.9% completed therapy per protocol, respectively. pCR favored arm B (28.7%, 95% CI = 0.22 to 0.36, vs 45.9%, 95% CI = 0.38 to 0.54; 95% CI(dBA) = 6.2% to 27.9%, P = .002) and was lower in nonresponders than in early responders (19.5% vs 44.4%, P < .001) or in patients with unclassifiable early response (50.0%). The nab-paclitaxel/gemcitabine was associated with more frequent dose reductions (20.6% vs 11.9%, P = .04), treatment-related serious adverse events (11.1% vs 5.3%, P = .07), grade 3-4 infections (7.2% vs 2.6%, P = .07), and grade 3-4 ALAT elevations (11.7 vs 3.3%, P = .01).
Conclusions: This first large randomized trial suggests high efficacy and excellent tolerability of a neoadjuvant nab-paclitaxel/carboplatin regimen, superior to nab-paclitaxel/gemcitabine in TNBC. De-escalation of further chemotherapy in patients with early pCR after a short anthracycline-free regimen is a promising field of future research. Early necrotic morphological changes and/or proliferation decrease after the first therapy cycle seem to be associated with subsequent pCR.
Similar articles
-
Phase II/III weekly nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine or carboplatin versus gemcitabine/carboplatin as first-line treatment of patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (the tnAcity study): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.Trials. 2015 Dec 16;16:575. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-1101-7. Trials. 2015. PMID: 26673577 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Genetic Alterations, Therapy Response, and Survival Among Patients With Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Feb 3;8(2):e2461639. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.61639. JAMA Netw Open. 2025. PMID: 40009381 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
TNBC-DX genomic test in early-stage triple-negative breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant taxane-based therapy.Ann Oncol. 2025 Feb;36(2):158-171. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2024.10.012. Epub 2024 Oct 16. Ann Oncol. 2025. PMID: 39419289
-
Nab-paclitaxel for the treatment of triple-negative breast cancer: Rationale, clinical data and future perspectives.Cancer Treat Rev. 2016 Nov;50:129-141. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2016.09.004. Epub 2016 Sep 12. Cancer Treat Rev. 2016. PMID: 27665540 Review.
-
Comparison between nab-paclitaxel and solvent-based taxanes as neoadjuvant therapy in breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC Cancer. 2021 Feb 4;21(1):118. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-07831-7. BMC Cancer. 2021. PMID: 33541289 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Exploring the Potential of Metallodrugs as Chemotherapeutics for Triple Negative Breast Cancer.Chemistry. 2021 Jun 21;27(35):8891-8917. doi: 10.1002/chem.202100438. Epub 2021 May 5. Chemistry. 2021. PMID: 33857345 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Post-Neoadjuvant Gemcitabine and Cisplatin with Regional Hyperthermia for Patients with Triple-Negative Breast Cancer and Non-pCR after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: A Single-Institute Experience.Breast Care (Basel). 2021 Apr;16(2):173-180. doi: 10.1159/000507473. Epub 2020 May 12. Breast Care (Basel). 2021. PMID: 34012372 Free PMC article.
-
Updated Neoadjuvant Treatment Landscape for Early Triple Negative Breast Cancer: Immunotherapy, Potential Predictive Biomarkers, and Novel Agents.Cancers (Basel). 2022 Aug 23;14(17):4064. doi: 10.3390/cancers14174064. Cancers (Basel). 2022. PMID: 36077601 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Randomized Phase II Trial of Anthracycline-free and Anthracycline-containing Neoadjuvant Carboplatin Chemotherapy Regimens in Stage I-III Triple-negative Breast Cancer (NeoSTOP).Clin Cancer Res. 2021 Feb 15;27(4):975-982. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-3646. Epub 2020 Nov 18. Clin Cancer Res. 2021. PMID: 33208340 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Pathological Response and Survival in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Following Neoadjuvant Carboplatin plus Docetaxel.Clin Cancer Res. 2018 Dec 1;24(23):5820-5829. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-0585. Epub 2018 Jul 30. Clin Cancer Res. 2018. PMID: 30061361 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials