EGFR mutation, smoking, and gender in advanced lung adenocarcinoma
- PMID: 29228697
- PMCID: PMC5716737
- DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.21842
EGFR mutation, smoking, and gender in advanced lung adenocarcinoma
Abstract
Purpose: In the current targeted therapy era, information on the effect of smoking in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant lung cancer patients is scarce.
Results: In total, 11,678 adenocarcinoma patients were enrolled. Of these, 33.3% and 91.8% of male and female patients were non-smokers, respectively. An increased amount of smoking (P < 0.001 for trend), fewer smoke-free years (P < 0.001 for trend), and younger age of smoking initiation (P = 0.034 for trend) were all associated with significantly lower EGFR mutation rates. Smokers had a shorter median overall survival (OS) among both EGFR-mutant and EGFR-wild type patients (17.8 vs. 21.1 months, and 7.9 vs. 11.4 months respectively; both P < 0.001). Among patients with EGFR-mutant adenocarcinoma, younger smokers were associated with shorter OS (P = 0.047). In multivariate analysis, female gender was an independent prognostic factor for OS (hazard ratio: 0.86 [95% confidence interval {CI}: 0.80-0.93]; P < 0.001 in the EGFR-mutant group and 0.88 [95% CI: 0.81-0.96]; P = 0.004 in the EGFR-wild type group).
Materials and methods: We reviewed the National Lung Cancer database (Taiwan) to assess the impact of smoking on the EGFR mutation rate and survival in advanced lung adenocarcinoma patients during 2011 and 2014 retrospectively.
Conclusions: Smoking was associated with lower incidence of EGFR mutation rate and reduced OS of advanced lung adenocarcinoma patients in a dose-dependent manner. In addition to EGFR mutation and smoking, gender also plays an important role in survival among these patients.
Keywords: epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation; lung adenocarcinoma; overall survival; smoking.
Conflict of interest statement
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST There are no conflicts of interest to declare.
Figures


References
-
- Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2015. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015;65:5–29. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21254 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Whiteman DC, Wilson LF. The fractions of cancer attributable to modifiable factors: A global review. Cancer Epidemiol. 2016;44:203–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canep.2016.06.013 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Wahbah M, Boroumand N, Castro C, El-Zeky F, Eltorky M. Changing trends in the distribution of the histologic types of lung cancer: a review of 4,439 cases. Ann Diagn Pathol. 2007;11:89–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2006.04.006 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Hsu KH, Ho CC, Hsia TC, Tseng JS, Su KY, Wu MF, Chiu KL, Yang TY, Chen KC, Ooi H, Wu TC, Chen HJ, Chen HY, et al. Identification of five driver gene mutations in patients with treatment-naive lung adenocarcinoma in Taiwan. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0120852. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0120852 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Tseng JS, Wang CL, Yang TY, Chen CY, Yang CT, Chen KC, Hsu KH, Tsai CR, Chang GC. Divergent epidermal growth factor receptor mutation patterns between smokers and non-smokers with lung adenocarcinoma. Lung Cancer. 2015;90:472–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2015.09.024 - DOI - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources