Quality of life for up to 18 months after low-energy hip, vertebral, and distal forearm fractures-results from the ICUROS
- PMID: 29230511
- DOI: 10.1007/s00198-017-4317-4
Quality of life for up to 18 months after low-energy hip, vertebral, and distal forearm fractures-results from the ICUROS
Abstract
This study used data from the International Costs and Utilities Related to Osteoporotic fractures Study (ICUROS) to estimate the quality of life (QoL) impact of fracture. Hip, vertebral, and distal forearm fractures incur substantial QoL losses. Hip and vertebral fracture results in markedly impaired QoL for at least 18 months.
Introduction: The International Costs and Utilities Related to Osteoporotic fractures Study (ICUROS) is a multinational observational study that aims to describe costs and quality of life (QoL) consequences of osteoporotic fractures. To date, 11 countries have participated in the study: Australia, Austria, Estonia, France, Italy, Lithuania, Mexico, Russia, Spain, the UK, and the USA. The objective of this paper is to describe the QoL impact of hip, vertebral, and distal forearm fracture.
Methods: Data were collected at four time-points for five QoL point estimates: within 2 weeks after fracture (including pre-fracture recall) and at 4, 12, and 18 months after fracture. Quality of life was measured as health state utility values (HSUVs) derived from the EQ-5D-3L. Complete case analysis was conducted as the base case with available case and multiple imputation performed as sensitivity analyses. Multivariate analysis was performed to explore predictors of QoL impact of fracture.
Results: Among 5456 patients enrolled using convenience sampling, 3021 patients were eligible for the base case analysis (1415 hip, 1047 distal forearm, and 559 vertebral fractures). The mean (SD) difference between HSUV before and after fracture for hip, vertebral, and distal forearm fracture was estimated at 0.89 (0.40), 0.67 (0.45), and 0.48 (0.34), respectively (p < 0.001 for all fracture types). Eighteen months after fracture, mean HSUVs were lower than before the fracture in patients with hip fracture (0.66 vs. 0.77 p < 0.001) and vertebral fracture (0.70 vs. 0.83 p < 0.001). Hospitalization and higher recalled pre-fracture QoL were associated with increased QoL impact for all fracture types.
Conclusions: Hip, vertebral, and distal forearm fractures incur substantial loss in QoL and for patients with hip or vertebral fracture, QoL is markedly impaired for at least 18 months.
Keywords: EQ-5D; Fracture; Health-related quality of life; Osteoporosis.
Similar articles
-
The International Costs and Utilities Related to Osteoporotic Fractures Study (ICUROS)--quality of life during the first 4 months after fracture.Osteoporos Int. 2013 Mar;24(3):811-23. doi: 10.1007/s00198-012-2240-2. Epub 2013 Jan 10. Osteoporos Int. 2013. PMID: 23306819
-
Quality of life after hip, vertebral, and distal forearm fragility fractures measured using the EQ-5D-3L, EQ-VAS, and time-trade-off: results from the ICUROS.Qual Life Res. 2018 Mar;27(3):707-716. doi: 10.1007/s11136-017-1748-5. Epub 2017 Dec 12. Qual Life Res. 2018. PMID: 29235059
-
Quality of life after fragility fracture in the Russian Federation: results from the Russian arm of the International Cost and Utility Related to Osteoporotic Fractures Study (ICUROS).Arch Osteoporos. 2020 Mar 2;15(1):37. doi: 10.1007/s11657-020-0699-6. Arch Osteoporos. 2020. PMID: 32124066 Free PMC article.
-
Quality of life in patients with osteoporosis.Osteoporos Int. 2005 May;16(5):447-55. doi: 10.1007/s00198-004-1762-7. Epub 2004 Dec 18. Osteoporos Int. 2005. PMID: 15609073 Review.
-
The incidence of fragility fractures in Italy.Aging Clin Exp Res. 2013 Oct;25 Suppl 1:S13-4. doi: 10.1007/s40520-013-0071-4. Epub 2013 Sep 18. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2013. PMID: 24046040 Review.
Cited by
-
Conceptual Framework for Optimised Proxy Value Set Selection Through Supra-National Value Set Development for the EQ-5D Instruments.Pharmacoeconomics. 2022 Dec;40(12):1221-1234. doi: 10.1007/s40273-022-01194-y. Epub 2022 Oct 6. Pharmacoeconomics. 2022. PMID: 36201130 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Effect of Body Surface Area on Severe Osteoporotic Fractures: A Study of Osteoporosis in Changsha China.Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022 Jul 22;13:927344. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.927344. eCollection 2022. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022. PMID: 35937839 Free PMC article.
-
Fragility fractures in Europe: burden, management and opportunities.Arch Osteoporos. 2020 Apr 19;15(1):59. doi: 10.1007/s11657-020-0706-y. Arch Osteoporos. 2020. PMID: 32306163 Free PMC article.
-
Longitudinal patient outcomes over 18 months following a hip, clinical vertebral, distal forearm, or proximal humerus fracture in the United States: results from the ICUROS US study.JBMR Plus. 2025 May 30;9(7):ziaf077. doi: 10.1093/jbmrpl/ziaf077. eCollection 2025 Jul. JBMR Plus. 2025. PMID: 40584158 Free PMC article.
-
Cost-effectiveness of FRAX®-based intervention thresholds for management of osteoporosis in Singaporean women.Osteoporos Int. 2021 Jan;32(1):133-144. doi: 10.1007/s00198-020-05536-4. Epub 2020 Aug 14. Osteoporos Int. 2021. PMID: 32797250 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical