Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Apr 15;37(8):1376-1388.
doi: 10.1002/sim.7582. Epub 2017 Dec 11.

Dynamic prediction in functional concurrent regression with an application to child growth

Affiliations

Dynamic prediction in functional concurrent regression with an application to child growth

Andrew Leroux et al. Stat Med. .

Abstract

In many studies, it is of interest to predict the future trajectory of subjects based on their historical data, referred to as dynamic prediction. Mixed effects models have traditionally been used for dynamic prediction. However, the commonly used random intercept and slope model is often not sufficiently flexible for modeling subject-specific trajectories. In addition, there may be useful exposures/predictors of interest that are measured concurrently with the outcome, complicating dynamic prediction. To address these problems, we propose a dynamic functional concurrent regression model to handle the case where both the functional response and the functional predictors are irregularly measured. Currently, such a model cannot be fit by existing software. We apply the model to dynamically predict children's length conditional on prior length, weight, and baseline covariates. Inference on model parameters and subject-specific trajectories is conducted using the mixed effects representation of the proposed model. An extensive simulation study shows that the dynamic functional regression model provides more accurate estimation and inference than existing methods. Methods are supported by fast, flexible, open source software that uses heavily tested smoothing techniques.

Keywords: covariance function; fPCA; face; longitudinal data; mixed effects; penalized splines; sparse functional data.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Distribution of, A, length‐for‐age z‐scores (LAZ), B, weight‐for‐age z‐scores (WAZ), C, weight‐for‐length z‐scores (WLZ) binned into monthly categories, and, D, estimated empirical correlation between LAZ and WAZ at each month. Correlations were calculated using Z‐scores projected onto an evenly spaced grid of ages {0.5,1.5,…,23.5} for all subjects using face::face.sparse() applied separately to LAZ and WAZ
Figure 2
Figure 2
Length‐for‐age z‐score and weight‐for‐age z‐score curves for 4 children. Length‐for‐age z‐score is presented as ∘ and weight‐for‐age z‐score is presented as +
Figure 3
Figure 3
Illustration of dynamic prediction using a subject from the CONTENT study. Conditional on the weight‐for‐age z‐score (WAZ) and length‐for‐age z‐score (LAZ) data in blue, the interest is to predict the length‐for‐age z‐score (LAZ) in red
Figure 4
Figure 4
Estimated coefficient functions (solid lines) and associated 95% pointwise confidence intervals (dashed lines). WAZ, weight‐for‐age z‐score
Figure 5
Figure 5
Left to right: A, estimated correlation function; B, estimated variance function; C, first 5 estimated eigenfunctions (ϕ) and corresponding eigenvalues (λ)
Figure 6
Figure 6
Example of dynamic prediction for 4 subjects. Points represent subjects' observed length‐for‐age z‐score (LAZs), solid black/red lines represent the predicted curves, dashed black/red lines indicate 95% pointwise confidence intervals for the trajectories. Only observed data on and to the left of the vertical grey dashed line (blue points) are used for prediction

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Liang K, Zeger S. Longtitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika. 1986;73(1):13‐22.
    1. Laird N, Ware J. Random‐effects models for longitudinal data. Biometrics. 1982;38(4):963‐974. - PubMed
    1. Lindstrom M, Bates D. Nonlinear mixed effects models for repeated measures data. Biometrics. 1990;46(3):673‐687. - PubMed
    1. Davidian M, Giltinan D. Nonlinear Models for Repeated Measurement Data. New York: Chapman and Hall; 1995.
    1. Grajeda LM, Ivanescu A, Saito M, et al. Modelling subject‐specific childhood growth using linear mixed‐effect models with cubic regression splines. Emerg Themes Epidemiol. 2016;13(1). - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources