Double Up Food Bucks program effects on SNAP recipients' fruit and vegetable purchases
- PMID: 29233128
- PMCID: PMC5727931
- DOI: 10.1186/s12889-017-4942-z
Double Up Food Bucks program effects on SNAP recipients' fruit and vegetable purchases
Abstract
Background: To encourage the consumption of more fresh fruits and vegetables, the 2014 United Sates Farm Bill allocated funds to the Double Up Food Bucks Program. This program provided Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program beneficiaries who spent $10 on fresh fruits and vegetables, in one transaction, with a $10 gift card exclusively for Michigan grown fresh fruits and vegetables. This study analyzes how fruit and vegetable expenditures, expenditure shares, variety and purchase decisions were affected by the initiation and conclusion, as well as any persistent effects of the program.
Methods: Changes in fruit and vegetable purchase behaviors due to Double Up Food Bucks in a supermarket serving a low-income, predominantly Hispanic community in Detroit, Michigan were evaluated using a difference in difference fixed effects estimation strategy.
Results: We find that the Double Up Food Bucks program increased vegetable expenditures, fruit and vegetable expenditure shares, and variety of fruits and vegetables purchased but the effects were modest and not sustainable without the financial incentive. Fruit expenditures and the fruit and vegetable purchase decision were unaffected by the program.
Conclusions: This study provides valuable insight on how a nutrition program influences a low-income, urban, Hispanic community's fruit and vegetable purchase behavior. Policy recommendations include either removing or lowering the purchase hurdle for incentive eligibility and dropping the Michigan grown requirement to better align with the customers' preferences for fresh fruits and vegetables.
Keywords: Detroit; Fruits and vegetables; Program evaluation; Scanner data; Supplemental nutrition assistance program.
Conflict of interest statement
Ethics approval and consent to participate
This research was determined to be non-human subject research by the Michigan State University IRB (IRB application # 15-922).
Consent for publication
Not Applicable
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Similar articles
-
Incentivizing fruit and vegetable purchases among participants in the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children.Public Health Nutr. 2015 Jan;18(1):33-41. doi: 10.1017/S1368980014000512. Epub 2014 May 9. Public Health Nutr. 2015. PMID: 24809502 Free PMC article.
-
Improving fruit and vegetable consumption among low-income customers at farmers markets: Philly Food Bucks, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 2011.Prev Chronic Dis. 2013 Oct 3;10:E166. doi: 10.5888/pcd10.120356. Prev Chronic Dis. 2013. PMID: 24135390 Free PMC article.
-
A Supermarket Double-Dollar Incentive Program Increases Purchases of Fresh Fruits and Vegetables Among Low-Income Families With Children: The Healthy Double Study.J Nutr Educ Behav. 2018 Mar;50(3):217-228.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2017.09.013. Epub 2017 Nov 7. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2018. PMID: 29126661 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Fruit and Vegetable Incentive Programs for Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) Participants: A Scoping Review of Program Structure.Nutrients. 2020 Jun 4;12(6):1676. doi: 10.3390/nu12061676. Nutrients. 2020. PMID: 32512758 Free PMC article.
-
Promoting healthy food consumption: a review of state-level policies to improve access to fruits and vegetables.WMJ. 2012 Dec;111(6):283-8. WMJ. 2012. PMID: 23362705 Review.
Cited by
-
Understanding SNAP Recipient Characteristics to Guide Equitable Expansion of Nutrition Incentive Programs in Diverse Food Retail Settings.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 20;19(9):4977. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19094977. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022. PMID: 35564371 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of a financial incentive scheme on purchase of fruits and vegetables from unorganised retailers in rural India: a cluster-randomised controlled trial.Lancet Reg Health Southeast Asia. 2023 Feb 1;12:100140. doi: 10.1016/j.lansea.2022.100140. eCollection 2023 May. Lancet Reg Health Southeast Asia. 2023. PMID: 37384059 Free PMC article.
-
Proactive prevention: Act now to disrupt the impending non-communicable disease crisis in low-burden populations.PLoS One. 2020 Dec 1;15(12):e0243004. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243004. eCollection 2020. PLoS One. 2020. PMID: 33259517 Free PMC article.
-
Nutritional quality of retail food purchases is not associated with participation in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program for nutrition-oriented households.PLoS One. 2020 Dec 18;15(12):e0240263. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240263. eCollection 2020. PLoS One. 2020. PMID: 33338058 Free PMC article.
-
Dietary policies and programs in the United States: A narrative review.Prev Med Rep. 2020 May 31;19:101135. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2020.101135. eCollection 2020 Sep. Prev Med Rep. 2020. PMID: 32551216 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Klerman JA, Bartlett S, Wilde P, Olsho L. The short-run impact of the healthy incentives pilot program on fruit and vegetable intake. Am J Agric Econ. 2014;96(5):1372–1382. doi: 10.1093/ajae/aau023. - DOI
-
- Double Up Food Bucks [http://www.doubleupfoodbucks.org]. Accessed 1 Mar 2015.
-
- USDA Announces up to $31 Million to Empower People to Make Healthy Eating Choices [http://www.fns.usda.gov/pressrelease/2014/021514]. Accessed 20 Oct 2015.
-
- Food Insecurity Nutrition Incentive (FINI) Grant Program [https://nifa.usda.gov/sites/default/files/rfa/FY%2016%20FINI_to%20POST.pdf]. Accessed 05 June 2016.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources