Intraoral scanners in dentistry: a review of the current literature
- PMID: 29233132
- PMCID: PMC5727697
- DOI: 10.1186/s12903-017-0442-x
Intraoral scanners in dentistry: a review of the current literature
Abstract
Background: Intraoral scanners (IOS) are devices for capturing direct optical impressions in dentistry. The purpose of this narrative review on the use of IOS was to: (1) identify the advantages/disadvantages of using optical impressions compared to conventional impressions; (2) investigate if optical impressions are as accurate as conventional impressions; (3) evaluate the differences between the IOS currently available commercially; (4) determine the current clinical applications/limitations in the use of IOS.
Methods: Electronic database searches were performed using specific keywords and MeSH terms. The searches were confined to full-text articles written in English and published in peer-reviewed journals between January 2007 and June 2017.
Results: One hundred thirty-two studies were included in the present review; among them, 20 were previous literature reviews, 78 were in vivo clinical studies (6 randomized controlled/crossover trials, 31 controlled/comparative studies; 24 cohort studies/case series; 17 case reports) and 34 were in vitro comparative studies.
Conclusions: Optical impressions reduce patient discomfort; IOS are time-efficient and simplify clinical procedures for the dentist, eliminating plaster models and allowing better communication with the dental technician and with patients; however, with IOS, it can be difficult to detect deep margin lines in prepared teeth and/or in case of bleeding, there is a learning curve, and there are purchasing and managing costs. The current IOS are sufficiently accurate for capturing impressions for fabricating a whole series of prosthetic restorations (inlays/onlays, copings and frameworks, single crowns and fixed partial dentures) on both natural teeth and implants; in addition, they can be used for smile design, and to fabricate posts and cores, removable partial prostheses and obturators. The literature to date does not support the use of IOS in long-span restorations with natural teeth or implants. Finally, IOS can be integrated in implant dentistry for guided surgery and in orthodontics for fabricating aligners and custom-made devices.
Keywords: Accuracy; Clinical use; Intraoral scanners; Optical impressions; Time efficiency.
Conflict of interest statement
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not Ethics Committee approval nor consent to participate was requested because the present study is a narrative review of the literature.
Consent for publication
Not applicable
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests in relation to the present work. Francesco Mangano is a Section Editor for BMC Oral Health.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Similar articles
-
ACCURACY OF INTRAORAL SCANNERS VERSUS TRADITIONAL IMPRESSIONS: A RAPID UMBRELLA REVIEW.J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2022 Sep;22(3):101719. doi: 10.1016/j.jebdp.2022.101719. Epub 2022 Mar 18. J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2022. PMID: 36162879
-
Accuracy of four intraoral scanners in oral implantology: a comparative in vitro study.BMC Oral Health. 2017 Jun 2;17(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s12903-017-0383-4. BMC Oral Health. 2017. PMID: 28577366 Free PMC article.
-
INTRAORAL SCANNERS AND CONVENTIONAL IMPRESSIONS: A LITERATURE REVIEW.Georgian Med News. 2024 Nov;(356):94-99. Georgian Med News. 2024. PMID: 39855170 Review.
-
Use of digital impression systems with intraoral scanners for fabricating restorations and fixed dental prostheses.J Oral Sci. 2018;60(1):1-7. doi: 10.2334/josnusd.17-0444. J Oral Sci. 2018. PMID: 29576569 Review.
-
Time efficiency, difficulty, and operator's preference comparing digital and conventional implant impressions: a randomized controlled trial.Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017 Oct;28(10):1318-1323. doi: 10.1111/clr.12982. Epub 2016 Sep 5. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017. PMID: 27596805 Clinical Trial.
Cited by
-
Influence of the CAD-CAM Systems on the Marginal Accuracy and Mechanical Properties of Dental Restorations.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun 15;17(12):4276. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17124276. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020. PMID: 32549291 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison in Terms of Accuracy between DLP and LCD Printing Technology for Dental Model Printing.Dent J (Basel). 2022 Sep 28;10(10):181. doi: 10.3390/dj10100181. Dent J (Basel). 2022. PMID: 36285991 Free PMC article.
-
Learning curve of digital intraoral scanning - an in vivo study.BMC Oral Health. 2020 Oct 19;20(1):287. doi: 10.1186/s12903-020-01278-1. BMC Oral Health. 2020. PMID: 33076894 Free PMC article.
-
Awareness on three-dimensional printing of orthodontic appliances among dental students.J Adv Pharm Technol Res. 2022 Dec;13(Suppl 2):S563-S567. doi: 10.4103/japtr.japtr_157_22. Epub 2022 Dec 30. J Adv Pharm Technol Res. 2022. PMID: 36798579 Free PMC article.
-
CAD/CAM Customized Glass Fiber Post and Core With Digital Intraoral Impression: A Case Report.Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2020 Feb 10;12:17-24. doi: 10.2147/CCIDE.S237442. eCollection 2020. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2020. PMID: 32104100 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Zimmermann M, Mehl A, Mörmann WH, Reich S. Intraoral scanning systems - a current overview. Int J Comput Dent. 2015;18(2):101–129. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical