Determinants of excessive daytime sleepiness in two First Nation communities
- PMID: 29233159
- PMCID: PMC5726026
- DOI: 10.1186/s12890-017-0536-x
Determinants of excessive daytime sleepiness in two First Nation communities
Abstract
Background: Excessive daytime sleepiness may be determined by a number of factors including personal characteristics, co-morbidities and socio-economic conditions. In this study we identified factors associated with excessive daytime sleepiness in 2 First Nation communities in rural Saskatchewan.
Methods: Data for this study were from a 2012-13 baseline assessment of the First Nations Lung Health Project, in collaboration between two Cree First Nation reserve communities in Saskatchewan and researchers at the University of Saskatchewan. Community research assistants conducted the assessments in two stages. In the first stage, brochures describing the purpose and nature of the project were distributed on a house by house basis. In the second stage, all individuals age 17 years and older not attending school in the participating communities were invited to the local health care center to participate in interviewer-administered questionnaires and clinical assessments. Excessive daytime sleepiness was defined as Epworth Sleepiness Scale score > 10.
Results: Of 874 persons studied, 829 had valid Epworth Sleepiness Scale scores. Of these, 91(11.0%) had excessive daytime sleepiness; 12.4% in women and 9.6% in men. Multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that respiratory comorbidities, environmental exposures and loud snoring were significantly associated with excessive daytime sleepiness.
Conclusions: Excessive daytime sleepiness in First Nations peoples living on reserves in rural Saskatchewan is associated with factors related to respiratory co-morbidities, conditions of poverty, and loud snoring.
Keywords: Co-morbidities; Epworth sleepiness scale; First Nations; Indigenous; Poverty; Sleepiness; Snoring.
Conflict of interest statement
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The study was approved by the Biomedical Research Ethics Board of the University of Saskatchewan (Certificate No. Bio #12–89) and adhered to Chapter 9 criteria of the Canadian Tri-Council requirements for conducting research with Indigenous people. Written consent was obtained from all participants.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
