Critical research gaps and recommendations to inform research prioritisation for more effective prevention and improved outcomes in colorectal cancer
- PMID: 29233930
- PMCID: PMC5754857
- DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2017-315333
Critical research gaps and recommendations to inform research prioritisation for more effective prevention and improved outcomes in colorectal cancer
Abstract
Objective: Colorectal cancer (CRC) leads to significant morbidity/mortality worldwide. Defining critical research gaps (RG), their prioritisation and resolution, could improve patient outcomes.
Design: RG analysis was conducted by a multidisciplinary panel of patients, clinicians and researchers (n=71). Eight working groups (WG) were constituted: discovery science; risk; prevention; early diagnosis and screening; pathology; curative treatment; stage IV disease; and living with and beyond CRC. A series of discussions led to development of draft papers by each WG, which were evaluated by a 20-strong patient panel. A final list of RGs and research recommendations (RR) was endorsed by all participants.
Results: Fifteen critical RGs are summarised below: RG1: Lack of realistic models that recapitulate tumour/tumour micro/macroenvironment; RG2: Insufficient evidence on precise contributions of genetic/environmental/lifestyle factors to CRC risk; RG3: Pressing need for prevention trials; RG4: Lack of integration of different prevention approaches; RG5: Lack of optimal strategies for CRC screening; RG6: Lack of effective triage systems for invasive investigations; RG7: Imprecise pathological assessment of CRC; RG8: Lack of qualified personnel in genomics, data sciences and digital pathology; RG9: Inadequate assessment/communication of risk, benefit and uncertainty of treatment choices; RG10: Need for novel technologies/interventions to improve curative outcomes; RG11: Lack of approaches that recognise molecular interplay between metastasising tumours and their microenvironment; RG12: Lack of reliable biomarkers to guide stage IV treatment; RG13: Need to increase understanding of health related quality of life (HRQOL) and promote residual symptom resolution; RG14: Lack of coordination of CRC research/funding; RG15: Lack of effective communication between relevant stakeholders.
Conclusion: Prioritising research activity and funding could have a significant impact on reducing CRC disease burden over the next 5 years.
Keywords: colorectal cancer.
© Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: ML reports support from Pfizer, outside the submitted work; DA reports grants from the Norman Foster Foundation, grants from the Tom Simms Memorial Fund at Queen’s University Belfast, during the conduct of the study; Dr Andreyev reports other from Entrinsic Health Solutions, Inc and personal fees from Macmillan Cancer Support, outside the submitted work; Professor Atkin reports grants from Cancer Research UK, outside the submitted work; Mr Bach reports personal fees from Ethicon Inc, outside the submitted work; Professor Burn has a patent A novel panel of short coding repeats suitable for high-throughput detection of microsatellite instability pending to Newcastle University; Dr Chau reports grants from Eli-Lily, Janssen-Cilag, Sanofi Oncology, Merck-Serono, and Novartis, personal fees from Taiho, Pfizer, Amgen, Eli-Lily, outside the submitted work; Professor Cheadle has a patent MUTYH gene variants licensed to Myriad Genetics and receives royalties; Professor Cunningham reports grants from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Celgene, Medimmune, Merck Serono, Merrimack, and Sanofi, outside the submitted work; Professor Fraser reports personal fees from Immunostics Inc, Ocean, NJ, USA, Kyowa, Tokyo, Japan, and support for travel from Alpha Labs Ltd, Eastleigh, Hants, UK, during the conduct of the study; DH reports MRC CASE Award with Merck Serono for project unrelated to this submission and research support from Merck Serono for project unrelated to this submission; MH reports other from consultancy for Thetis Pharma, outside the submitted work; CN reports personal fees from Takeda and Ferring, outside the submitted work; Dr Sharma reports grants, personal fees and other from Sirtex, grants, personal fees and other from BTG, during the conduct of the study; AT reports personal fees from BMS Advisory Board, Roche Speaker Panel, Amgen Advisory Board, and Servier Advisory Board, outside the submitted work; LMW reports personal fees from Atticus Consultants Ltd, during the conduct of the study; RW reports personal fees from BMS Advisory Board, Clovis Oncology Advisory Board, Halozyme Advisory Board, Amgen Advisory Board, Servier Advisory Board, and Sirtex Independent Data Monitoring and Safety Committee, all outside the submitted work. RA, Professor Ahmedzai, ASA, Mr Arbuthnot, Mrs Berkman, Miss Bloor, Mr Boulter, Mrs Cole, Dr Brewster, GB, Professor Cazier, Dr Coyle, Mr Davies, Professor Downward, Professor Dunlop, NSF, SF, Dr Gerlinger, Dr Glaser, Professor Goh, Professor González De Castro, Dr Graham, Mr Griffith, Professor Halligan, SPH, Professor Hamilton, Mrs Hepburn, Dr Hold, Mr Holden, Professor Houlston, Dr Hubbard, Dr Iqbal, Dr Irvine, Dr Iveson, Mr Jackson, Mr Jakowiw, Mrs Jefford, Professor Longley, Dr McDermott, AGKM, Mr Machesney, Professor Maher, Professor Marchesi, Professor Maughan, Professor Middleton, Mr Moss, Mrs Moss, KJM, Dr Murchie, IN, MRN, Mr O’Sullivan, Mr Robertson, Professor Rutter, Dr Sansom, Dr Samuel, Professor Saxton, Dr Seward, Mrs Smith, Dr Sottoriva, RS, Professor Steward, Mr Stocker, Mrs Sweetman, IT, Dr Von Wagner and Professor Williams have nothing to disclose.
Figures
References
-
- Cancer Research UK. Bowel cancer statistics. http://www.cancerresearchuk.org/health-professional/cancer-statistics/st... (accessed 08 Sep 2017).
-
- The American Cancer Society. http://www.cancer.org/acs/groups/content/@internationalaffairs/documents... (accessed 08 Sep 2017).
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
- MC_UU_00007/1/MRC_/Medical Research Council/United Kingdom
- 24387/CRUK_/Cancer Research UK/United Kingdom
- MC_PC_17117/MRC_/Medical Research Council/United Kingdom
- 12076/CRUK_/Cancer Research UK/United Kingdom
- NC/M001156/1/NC3RS_/National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research/United Kingdom
- 16459/CRUK_/Cancer Research UK/United Kingdom
- 11243/CRUK_/Cancer Research UK/United Kingdom
- 17044/CRUK_/Cancer Research UK/United Kingdom
- 15680/CRUK_/Cancer Research UK/United Kingdom
- G0802030/MRC_/Medical Research Council/United Kingdom
- 15954/CRUK_/Cancer Research UK/United Kingdom
- 15116/CRUK_/Cancer Research UK/United Kingdom
- 11/100/50/DH_/Department of Health/United Kingdom
- 18377/CRUK_/Cancer Research UK/United Kingdom
- MC_PC_U127527198/MRC_/Medical Research Council/United Kingdom
- 110371/Z/15/Z/WT_/Wellcome Trust/United Kingdom
- 09/22/49/DH_/Department of Health/United Kingdom
- MC_U127527198/MRC_/Medical Research Council/United Kingdom
- CS-2017-17-010/DH_/Department of Health/United Kingdom
- MR/K025643/1/MRC_/Medical Research Council/United Kingdom
- MR/M016587/1/MRC_/Medical Research Council/United Kingdom
- 16463/CRUK_/Cancer Research UK/United Kingdom
- 18927/CRUK_/Cancer Research UK/United Kingdom
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Molecular Biology Databases