Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2018 Jun;32(6):2746-2757.
doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5973-3. Epub 2017 Dec 12.

Enhanced recovery care versus traditional care after laparoscopic liver resections: a randomized controlled trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Enhanced recovery care versus traditional care after laparoscopic liver resections: a randomized controlled trial

Xiao Liang et al. Surg Endosc. 2018 Jun.

Abstract

Background: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS), with several evidence-based elements, has been shown to shorten length of hospital stay and reduce perioperative hospital costs in many operations. This randomized clinical trial was performed to compare complications and hospital stay of laparoscopic liver resection between ERAS and traditional care.

Methods: A randomized controlled trial was performed for laparoscopic liver resection from August 2015 to August 2016. Patients were randomly divided into ERAS group and traditional care group. The primary outcome was length of hospital stay (LOS) after surgery. Second outcomes included postoperative complications, hospital cost, and 30-day readmissions. Elements used in ERAS group included more perioperative education, nurse navigators, nutrition support for liver diseases, respiratory therapy, oral carbohydrate 2 h before operation, early mobilization and oral intake, goal-directed fluid therapy, less drainages, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) prophylaxis and multimodal analgesia.

Results: The study included 58 (two conversion to laparotomy) patients in ERAS group and 61 (three conversion to laparotomy) patients in the traditional care group. Postoperative LOS was significantly shorter in the ERAS group than traditional care group (5 vs. 8 days; p < 0.001). ERAS program significantly reduced the hospital costs (CNY 45413.1 vs. 55794.1; p = 0.006) and complications (36.2 vs. 55.7%; p = 0.033). Duration till first flatus and PONV were significantly reduced in ERAS group. Pain control was better in ERAS (Visual analogue scale (VAS) POD1 (≥ 4) 19.0 vs. 39.3%, p = 0.017; VAS POD1 2.5 vs. 3.1, p = 0.010). There was no difference in the rate of 30-day readmissions (6.9 vs. 8.2%; p = 1.000).

Conclusion: ERAS protocol is feasible and safe for laparoscopic liver resection. Patients in ERAS group have less pain and complications.

Keywords: Complications; Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS); Laparoscopic liver resection; Length of hospital stay; Pain control; Randomized controlled trial.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Crit Care Med. 2009 Oct;37(10 Suppl):S422-8 - PubMed
    1. World J Surg. 2009 Mar;33(3):577-85 - PubMed
    1. Dig Surg. 2007;24(6):441-9 - PubMed
    1. Trials. 2012 May 06;13:54 - PubMed
    1. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2013 Jun;39(6):542-7 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources