Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2018 Apr;35(4):693-699.
doi: 10.1007/s10815-017-1099-8. Epub 2017 Dec 12.

Low versus high volume of culture medium during embryo transfer: a randomized clinical trial

George Α Sigalos  1   2 , Yannis Michalopoulos  3 , Athanasios G Kastoras  3 , Olga Triantafyllidou  3 , Nikos F Vlahos  4
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Low versus high volume of culture medium during embryo transfer: a randomized clinical trial

George Α Sigalos et al. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2018 Apr.

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this prospective randomized control trial was to evaluate if the use of two different volumes (20-25 vs 40-45 μl) of media used for embryo transfer affects the clinical outcomes in fresh in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles.

Methods: In total, 236 patients were randomized in two groups, i.e., "low volume" group (n = 118) transferring the embryos with 20-25 μl of medium and "high volume" group (n = 118) transferring the embryos with 40-45 μl of medium. The clinical pregnancy, implantation, and ongoing pregnancy rates were compared between the two groups.

Results: No statistically significant differences were observed in clinical pregnancy (46.8 vs 54.3%, p = 0.27), implantation (23.7 vs 27.8%, p = 0.30), and ongoing pregnancy (33.3 vs 40.0%, p = 0.31) rates between low and high volume group, respectively.

Conclusion: Higher volume of culture medium to load the embryo into the catheter during embryo transfer does not influence the clinical outcome in fresh IVF cycles.

Trial registration number: NCT03350646.

Keywords: Clinical pregnancy rate; Culture medium; Embryo transfer; Loading the catheter; Volume.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Loading the catheter with the three-drop method. C.M. culture medium
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Flowchart showing the number of patients in each stage of the study
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Schoolcraft WB, Surrey ES, Gardner DK. Embryo transfer: techniques and variables affecting success. Fertil Steril. 2001;76:863–870. doi: 10.1016/S0015-0282(01)02731-5. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bontekoe S, Heineman MJ, Johnson N, Blake D. Adherence compounds in embryo transfer media for assisted reproductive technologies. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;2:CD007421. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Abou-Setta AM, Al-Inany HG, Mansour RT, Serour GI, Aboulghar MA. Soft versus firm embryo transfer catheters for assisted reproduction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod. 2005;20:3114–3121. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dei198. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mansour RT, Aboulghar MA. Optimizing the embryo transfer technique. Hum Reprod. 2002;17:1149–1153. doi: 10.1093/humrep/17.5.1149. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sigalos G, Triantafyllidou O, Vlahos N. How do laboratory embryo transfer techniques affect IVF outcomes? A review of current literature. Hum Fertil (Camb) 2017;20:3–13. doi: 10.1080/14647273.2016.1255357. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data