Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Dec 13;7(1):17538.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-15386-6.

Relationship of corneal hysteresis and optic nerve parameters in healthy myopic subjects

Affiliations

Relationship of corneal hysteresis and optic nerve parameters in healthy myopic subjects

Kunliang Qiu et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

The association between corneal biomechanical properties and glaucoma is an area of much interest. We determined the relationship between corneal hysteresis (CH) and optic nerve parameters in healthy myopic subjects in the current study. CH was measured with Reichert Ocular Response Analyzer in 108 eyes from 108 healthy myopic subjects. All subjects received retinal nerve fiber layer and optic disc imaging Cirrus HD-OCT, GDx ECC, and Heidelberg Retina Tomograph II. None of the tested optic nerve parameters showed statistical significance with CH by using correlation analysis. For RNFL parameters, there was a negative but not statistically significant correlation between CH and average RNFL thickness obtained with OCT (r = -0.15, p = 0.13). For optic disc parameters, there was a negative but not statistically significant correlation between CH and rim area measured with OCT (r = -0.10, p = 0.29). The current study did not find any statistically significant relationship between CH and optic nerve parameters as measured by all three imaging modalities in healthy myopic eyes. Therefore, the relationship observed previously in glaucoma subjects is likely coming to fruition as optic nerve damage is caused by the disease.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Histogram of corneal hysteresis (A) and spherical equivalent (B) of all included eyes.

References

    1. Matsuura M, et al. The usefulness of CorvisST Tonometry and the Ocular Response Analyzer to assess the progression of glaucoma. Sci Rep. 2017;17(7):40798. doi: 10.1038/srep40798. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pillunat KR, Hermann C, Spoerl E, Pillunat LE. Analyzing biomechanical parameters of the cornea with glaucoma severity in open-angle glaucoma. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2016;254(7):1345–51. doi: 10.1007/s00417-016-3365-3. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zimmermann M, Pitz S, Schmidtmann I, Pfeiffer N, Wasielica-Poslednik J. Tonographic Effect of Ocular Response Analyzer in Comparison to Goldmann Applanation Tonometry. PLoS One. 2017;12(1):e0169438. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169438. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Luce DA. Determining in vivo biomechanical properties of the cornea with an ocular response analyzer. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31:156–62. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.10.044. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Prata TS, et al. Association between corneal biomechanical properties and optic nerve head morphology in newly diagnosed glaucoma patients. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol. 2012;40:682–88. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-9071.2012.02790.x. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources