Comparing different nanofat procedures on scars: role of the stromal vascular fraction and its clinical implications
- PMID: 29236575
- DOI: 10.2217/rme-2017-0076
Comparing different nanofat procedures on scars: role of the stromal vascular fraction and its clinical implications
Erratum in
-
Corrigendum.Regen Med. 2018 Jan;13(1):117. doi: 10.2217/rme-2017-0076c1. Epub 2018 Jan 25. Regen Med. 2018. PMID: 29368999 No abstract available.
Abstract
Aim: Recently, a new fat grafting technique termed 'nanofat grafting' was proposed which improved tissue repair by the stem cells contained in the stromal vascular fraction (SVF) of nanofat. Here, we reported the clinical outcomes of different nanofat procedures in the treatment of scars in relation with SVF cell yield.
Methods: Three different modified nanofat grafting procedures (supercharged-, evo- and centrifuged-modified nanofat) were compared with the classic nanofat method, and histological analysis was performed to assess skin regeneration. Residual nanofat samples were analyzed to determine SVF immunophenotype and yield from each procedure.
Results: Supercharged-modified nanofat gave the best results in terms of clinical outcome and SVF yield. Histological analysis revealed similar skin regeneration in all treatments.
Conclusion: This work suggested a positive correlation between SVF yield and clinical outcomes in the nanofat treatment of scars.
Keywords: adipose-derived stem cells; clinical outcome; nanofat grafting; scars; skin regeneration; stromal vascular fraction.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical