Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Dec 13;14(1):175.
doi: 10.1186/s12978-017-0436-9.

Supply kits for antenatal and childbirth care: a systematic review

Affiliations

Supply kits for antenatal and childbirth care: a systematic review

Alicia Aleman et al. Reprod Health. .

Abstract

Introduction: It is critical to increase the uptake of interventions proven to be effective to improve maternal and perinatal outcomes. Supply kits have been suggested to be a feasible strategy designed to ensure timely availability and effective follow-up of care.

Objective: We conducted a systematic review to summarize the evidence on the uptake, effectiveness and safety of supply kits for maternal care.

Search strategy: MEDLINE, the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register, Campbell Collaboration, Lilacs, Embase and unpublished studies were searched.

Selection criteria: Studies that reported the efficacy, safety and use of supply kits for maternal healthcare were eligible. Participants were pregnant women or in childbirth. Supply kits were defined as a collection of medicines, supplies or instruments packaged together with the aim of conducting a healthcare task.

Data collection and analysis: Two reviewers independently performed the screening, data extraction, and methodological and quality assessment.

Main results: 24 studies were included: 4 of them were systematic reviews and 20 primary studies. Eighteen studies evaluated a so-called "clean delivery kit". In all but two studies, the kits were used by more than half of the participants. A meta-analysis was deemed inappropriate due to the heterogeneity in study design, in the components of the interventions implemented, in the content of the kits, and in outcomes. Nine studies assessed neonatal outcomes and found statistically significant reductions in cord infection, sepsis and tetanus-related mortality in the intervention group. Three studies showed evidence of reduced neonatal mortality (OR 0.52, 0.60 and 0.71) with statistically significant confidence intervals in all cases. Four studies reported odd ratios for maternal mortality, but only one showed evidence of a statistically significant decrease in this outcome but it was ascribed to hand washing prior to childbirth and not with the use of kits.

Conclusion: This review suggests potential benefits in the use of supply kits to improve maternal and neonatal health. However, the observational nature of the studies, the heterogeneity and the use of kits incorporated within complex interventions limit the interpretation of the findings.

Keywords: Childbirth; Clean delivery kits; Maternal mortality; Neonatal mortality; Pregnancy; Supply kits.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

All authors consent publication.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow Diagram

References

    1. World Health Organization (WHO). Maternal Mortality. Fact sheet N° 348. Updated November 2015. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs348/en/. Accessed 26 Oct 2016.
    1. United Nations. Open working group of the general assembly on sustainable development goals. 2014. http://undocs.org/A/68/970. Accessed 30 July 2016.
    1. Kearns AD, Caglia JM, Ten Hoope-Bender P, Langer A. Antenatal and postnatal care: a review of innovative models for improving availability, accessibility, acceptability and quality of services in low-resource settings. BJOG. 2016;123:540–548. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13818. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Improving Birth Outcomes; Bale JR, Stoll BJ, Lucas AO, editors. Improving Birth Outcomes: Meeting the Challenge in the Developing World. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2003. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK222097/. doi:10.17226/10841. - PubMed
    1. Ikoh M, Udo A, Charles A, Charles J. The influence of "stock out" on health-seeking behavior of low income women in Uyo urban, Akwa Ibom state, Nigeria. Int Q Community Health Educ. 2008;29:257–273. doi: 10.2190/IQ.29.3.e. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types