Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jan/Feb;67(1):16-25.
doi: 10.1097/NNR.0000000000000258.

Hospital-Acquired Pressure Injury: Risk-Adjusted Comparisons in an Integrated Healthcare Delivery System

Affiliations

Hospital-Acquired Pressure Injury: Risk-Adjusted Comparisons in an Integrated Healthcare Delivery System

June Rondinelli et al. Nurs Res. 2018 Jan/Feb.

Abstract

Background: Although healthcare organizations have decreased hospital-acquired pressure injury (HAPI) rates, HAPIs are not eliminated, driving further examination in both nursing and health services research.

Objective: The objective was to describe HAPI incidence, risk factors, and risk-adjusted hospital variation within a California integrated healthcare system.

Methods: Inpatient episodes were included in this retrospective cohort if patients were hospitalized between January 1, 2013, and June 30, 2015. The primary outcome was development of a HAPI over time. Predictors included cited HAPI risk factors in addition to incorporation of a longitudinal comorbidity burden (Comorbidity Point Score, Version 2 [COPS2]), a severity-of-illness score (Laboratory-Based Acute Physiology Score, Version 2 [LAPS2]), and the Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Ulcer Risk.

Results: Analyses included HAPI inpatient episodes (n = 1661) and non-HAPI episodes (n = 726,605). HAPI incidence was 0.57 per 1,000 patient days (95% CI [0.019, 3.805]) and 0.2% of episodes. A multivariate Cox proportional hazards model showed significant (p < .001) hazard ratios (HRs) for the change from the 25th to the 75th percentile for age (HR = 1.36, 95% CI [1.25, 1.45]), higher COPS2 scores (HR = 1.10, 95% CI [1.04, 1.16]), and higher LAPS2 scores (HR = 1.38, 95% CI [1.28, 1.50]). Female gender, an emergency room admission for a medical reason, and higher Braden scores showed significant protective HRs (HR < 1.00, p < .001). After risk adjustment, significant variation remained among the 35 hospitals.

Discussion: Results prompt the consideration of age, severity of illness (LAPS2), comorbidity indexes (COPS2), and the Braden score as important predictors for HAPI risk. HAPI rates may be low; however, because of significant individual site variation, HAPIs remain an area to explore through both research and quality improvement initiatives.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Cumulative incidence plot for hospital-acquired pressure injury hazard over 0–30 days of hospitalization.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Hazard ratio graph with 95% confidence intervals based on the multivariate Cox proportional hazards model (Table 4). The admission category of non-ED/surgical (N-ED/S) is the reference group and is not displayed. Admit ED/S = admission from the emergency department and a surgery during the episode; Admit ED/M = admission from the emergency room for a medical reason and did not have surgery during the episode; Admit N-ED/M = admitted directly to the hospital (not through the emergency department) for a medical reason; Full code = designation as a full code for the episode; LAPS2 = the Laboratory-based Acute Physiology Score, Version 2 (This is a score measuring acute physiologic instability during the 72 hours preceding admission—the higher the score, the greater the mortality risk due to acute physiologic derangement.); COPS2 = Comorbidity Point Score, Version 2 (This is a longitudinal score based on 12 months of patient data—the higher the score, the greater the mortality risk due to comorbid illness.); Braden = the lowest Braden score in the first 24 hours since admission (lower Braden scores indicate a greater risk for pressure injury development).
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Risk-adjusted hospital effect for hospital-acquired pressure injury (HAPI). The x-axis shows individual hospitals, and the y-axis shows the risk-adjusted hospital random effect on the probability of experiencing a HAPI for each hospital (vertical bars). The horizontal lines denote 1 SD marks. The HAPI risk increases by >90% for hospitals with effects above 1 SD.

References

    1. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. 2015 National healthcare quality and disparities report and 5th anniversary update on the national quality strategy. Rockville, MD: Author; 2016. (AHRQ Publication No. 16-0015). Retrieved from https://www.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/research/findings/nhqrd....
    1. Alderden J, Whitney JD, Taylor SM, Zaratkiewicz S. Risk profile characteristics associated with outcomes of hospitalacquired pressure ulcers: A retrospective review. Critical Care Nurse. 2011;31:30–43. doi: 10.4037/ccn2011806. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Austin PC, Lee DS, Fine JP. Introduction to the analysis of survival data in the presence of competing risks. Circulation. 2016;133:601–609. doi: 10.1161/circulationaha.115.017719. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baharestani MM, Black JM, Carville K, Clark M, Cuddigan JE, Dealey C, Sanada H. Dilemmas in measuring and using pressure ulcer prevalence and incidence: An international consensus. International Wound Journal. 2009;6:97–104. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2009.00593.x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bergquist-Beringer SD, Davidson J, Cuddigan J. Module IV: Community vs. hospital/unit acquired pressure ulcers. 2017 Retrieved from https://members.nursingquality.org/NDNQIPressureUlcerTraining/

Publication types