Deciding How to Stay Independent at Home in Later Years: Development and Acceptability Testing of an Informative Web-Based Module
- PMID: 29242178
- PMCID: PMC5746619
- DOI: 10.2196/humanfactors.8387
Deciding How to Stay Independent at Home in Later Years: Development and Acceptability Testing of an Informative Web-Based Module
Abstract
Background: Seniors with loss of autonomy may face decisions about whether they should stay at home or move elsewhere. Most seniors would prefer to stay home and be independent for as long as possible, but most are unaware of options that would make this possible.
Objective: The study aimed to develop and test the acceptability of an interactive website for seniors, their caregivers, and health professionals with short interlinked videos presenting information about options for staying independent at home.
Methods: The approach for design and data collection varied, involving a multipronged, user-centered design of the development process, qualitative interviews, and end-user feedback to determine content (ie, needs assessment) in phase I; module development (in English and French) in phase II; and survey to test usability and acceptability with end users in phase III. Phase I participants were a convenience sample of end users, that is, seniors, caregivers, and professionals with expertise in modifiable factors (eg, day centers, home redesign, equipment, community activities, and finances), enabling seniors to stay independent at home for longer in Quebec and Alberta, Canada. Phase II participants were bilingual actors; phase III participants included phase I participants and new participants recruited through snowballing. Qualitative interviews were thematically analyzed in phase II to determine relevant topics for the video-scripts, which were user-checked by interview participants. In phase III, the results of a usability questionnaire were analyzed using descriptive statistics.
Results: In phase I, interviews with 29 stakeholders, including 4 seniors, 3 caregivers, and 22 professionals, showed a need for a one-stop information resource about options for staying independent at home. They raised issues relating to 6 categories: cognitive autonomy, psychological or mental well-being, functional autonomy, social autonomy, financial autonomy, and people involved. A script was developed and evaluated by participants. In phase II, after 4 days in a studio with 15 bilingual actors, 30 videos were made of various experts (eg, family doctor, home care nurse, and social worker) presenting options and guidance for the decision-making process. These were integrated into an interactive website, which included a comments tool for visitors to add information. In phase III (n=21), 8 seniors (7 women, mean age 75 years), 7 caregivers, and 6 professionals evaluated the acceptability of the module and suggested improvements. Clarity of the videos scored 3.6 out of 4, length was considered right by 17 (separate videos) and 13 participants (all videos together), and 18 participants considered the module acceptable. They suggested that information should be tailored more, and that seniors may need someone to help navigate it.
Conclusions: Our interactive website with interlinked videos presenting information about options for staying independent at home was deemed acceptable and potentially helpful by a diverse group of stakeholders.
Keywords: decision making; decision support techniques; housing for the elderly; instruction films and videos; shared.
©Mirjam Marjolein Garvelink, C Allyson Jones, Patrick M Archambault, Noémie Roy, Louisa Blair, France Légaré. Originally published in JMIR Human Factors (http://humanfactors.jmir.org), 14.12.2017.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of Interest: None declared.
References
-
- Ministère de la Santé et des Services sociaux . Gouvernement Quebec. Quebec: ministère de la Santé et des Services sociaux (Gouvernement Quebec); 2003. [2017-10-01]. Chez soi le premier choix : La politique de soutien à domicile http://publications.msss.gouv.qc.ca/acrobat/f/documentation/2002/02-704-... 6u58dxXCT.
-
- Doekhie KD, de Veer AJE, Rademakers JJDJM, Schellevis FG, Francke AL. Nivel. Utrecht, the Netherlands: NIVEL; 2014. [2017-10-01]. Overview studies the elderly and the future: Differences in the preferences and possibilities for living, wellbeing and care Utrecht https://www.nivel.nl/sites/default/files/bestanden/Overzichtstudie-ouder... 6u58zltcu.
-
- World Health Organization . OHCHR.org. WHO; 2015. [2017-10-01]. Ensuring a human rights-based approach for people living with dementia http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Issues/OlderPersons/Dementia/ThematicBrie... 6u594FeZK.
-
- Statistics Canada . Statcan. Ottawa: Government of Canada; 2016. [2017-10-01]. Statistics by subject – Housing and living arrangements http://www.statcan.gc.ca/eng/subjects/seniors/housing_and_living_arrange... 6u5976BHn.
-
- Ministère de la Famille et des Aînés. Ministère de la Santé et des Services sociaux . MFA. Quebec: Ministère de la Famille et des Aînés; 2012. [2017-10-01]. Vieillir et vivre ensemble: Chez soi, dans sa communauté, au québec https://www.mfa.gouv.qc.ca/fr/publication/Documents/politique-vieillir-e... 6u59AUBbR.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources