Operative versus nonoperative treatment of displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures: A meta-analysis of current evidence base
- PMID: 29245290
- PMCID: PMC5728905
- DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000009027
Operative versus nonoperative treatment of displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures: A meta-analysis of current evidence base
Abstract
Background: The relative efficacy of operative and nonoperative treatments for the displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures (DIACF) remains uncertain.
Object: We conducted a meta-analysis to compare the effectiveness of operative and nonoperative treatments in treating patients with DIACF.
Methods: Databases including Cochrane Library, Medline, Embase, CBM, CNKI, and Google Scholar were searched. After independent study selection by 2 authors, data were extracted and collected independently. Comparisons were performed between operative treatment group and nonoperative treatment group. The quality of included studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. RevMan 5.3 was used for data analysis. The primary outcome measures were anatomical measures (changes in Böhler angle and calcaneal height and width), functional measures (shoe problems, resuming preinjury work, and residual pain), and complications (including superficial and deep wound infection, skin flap necrosis, neurovascular injury, secondary arthrodesis, reflex sympathetic dystrophy, osteotomy, thromboembolism, and compartment syndromes).
Results: Eighteen trials (8 randomized controlled trials and 10 controlled clinical trials) including 1467 patients were considered. For anatomical measurements, the overall mean differences (MDs) for the mean Böhler angle, calcaneal height and width were 15.39 (95% confidence interval [CI] 9.12-21.67), 6.55 (95% CI 2.67-10.43), and 7.05 (95% CI -7.83 to -6.27), respectively. In functional measures, the overall effect MD of American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society was 6.23 (95% CI 5.22-17.67) and 0.38 (95% CI 0.22-0.67). The overall relative risks (RRs) of wearing shoes, resuming preinjury work, and having residual pain were 0.32 (95% CI 0.32-1.00), 0.56 (95% CI 0.40-0.77), and 0.90 (95% CI 0.68-1.20), respectively. The overall RR of the incidence of complications was 2.00 (95% CI 1.51-2.64).
Conclusion: Operative treatment of DIACF may lead to a higher incidence of complications but has better anatomical recovery when compared with nonoperative treatment.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Figures
References
-
- Zwipp H, Rammelt S, Barthel S. Calcaneal fractures—the most frequent tarsal fractures. Ther Umsch 2004;61:435–50. - PubMed
-
- Stulik J, Stehlik J, Rysavy M, et al. Minimally-invasive treatment of intra-articular fractures of the calcaneum. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2006;88:1634–41. - PubMed
-
- Thordarson DB, Krieger LE. Operative vs. nonoperative treatment of intra-articular fractures of the calcaneus: a prospective randomized trial. Foot Ankle Int 1996;17:2–9. - PubMed
-
- Järvholm U, Körner L, Thorén O, et al. Fractures of the calcaneus. A comparison of open and closed treatment. Acta Orthop Scand 1984;55:652–6. - PubMed
-
- Thornes BS, Collins AL, Timlin M, et al. Outcome of calcaneal fractures treated operatively and non-operatively. The effect of litigation on outcomes. Ir J Med Sci 2002;171:155–7. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous
