Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Dec 15;17(1):957.
doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4961-9.

Spatial clustering of measles vaccination coverage among children in sub-Saharan Africa

Affiliations

Spatial clustering of measles vaccination coverage among children in sub-Saharan Africa

Tenley K Brownwright et al. BMC Public Health. .

Abstract

Background: During the past two decades, vaccination programs have greatly reduced global morbidity and mortality due to measles, but recently this progress has stalled. Even in countries that report high vaccination coverage rates, transmission has continued, particularly in spatially clustered subpopulations with low vaccination coverage.

Methods: We examined the spatial heterogeneity of measles vaccination coverage among children aged 12-23 months in ten Sub-Saharan African countries. We used the Anselin Local Moran's I to estimate clustering of vaccination coverage based on data from Demographic and Health Surveys conducted between 2008 and 2013. We also examined the role of sociodemographic factors to explain clustering of low vaccination.

Results: We detected 477 spatial clusters with low vaccination coverage, many of which were located in countries with relatively high nationwide vaccination coverage rates such as Zambia and Malawi. We also found clusters in border areas with transient populations. Clustering of low vaccination coverage was related to low health education and limited access to healthcare.

Conclusions: Systematically monitoring clustered populations with low vaccination coverage can inform supplemental immunization activities and strengthen elimination programs. Metrics of spatial heterogeneity should be used routinely to determine the success of immunization programs and the risk of disease persistence.

Keywords: Africa; MCV; Measles; Spatial analysis; Spatial heterogeneity; Spatial regression.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

We have received written approval to use Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) data for this study from the DHS administration, via their online application system.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Vaccination coverage and DHS clusters in the study area. The location of each DHS cluster is depicted as a grey circle. We computed the average vaccination coverage rate for each country from DHS cluster-level data. Both maps were created by study investigators using open access data sources
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Spatial clustering of vaccination coverage in DHS clusters. Using the Anselin Local Moran’s I, we classified each DHS cluster as being part of a spatial cluster with low-vaccination, high-vaccination, or mixed vaccination coverage (low-vaccination near high-vaccination or vice versa). Grey circles indicate that vaccination coverage for a DHS cluster was not statistically significantly clustered. a We detected clustering of low, mixed, and high vaccination coverage in all countries. Vaccination coverage in some spatial clusters contrasted nationwide vaccination coverage rates: e.g., b in the Zanzibar/Pemba islands and the Kenya-Tanzania border population (low vaccination vs. high nationwide); c in Northern Malawi (low vaccination vs. high nationwide); and (d) in the Madagascar capital region (high vaccination vs. low nationwide)

References

    1. Perry RT, Murray JS, Gacic-Dobo M, Dabbagh A, Mulders MN, Strebel PM, et al. Progress toward regional measles elimination - worldwide, 2000-2014. MMWR. Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. United States; 2015;64:1246–51. - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization. Measles [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2016 Mar 1]. Available from: www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs286/en/.
    1. Sudfeld CR, Navar AM, Halsey NA. Effectiveness of measles vaccination and vitamin A treatment. Int. J. Epidemiol. England; 2010;39 Suppl 1:i48–i55. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Demicheli V, Rivetti A, Debalini M, Di Pietrantonj C. Vaccines for measles, mumps and rubella in children (Review). cochrane Libr. [Internet]. 2012 [cited 2016 Aug 17];2:CD004407. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22336803. - PMC - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization. Global measles and rubella strategic plan 2012-2020. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2012.

Substances