Selection, implementation, and interpretation of patient-centered shoulder and elbow outcomes

Abstract

The movement toward a value-based health care market requires comparison of physicians, hospitals, and health systems. Traditionally, process-based measures such as infection and readmission rates have been used. However, these events are uncommon in shoulder and elbow surgery, thus limiting their utility. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are a promising measure of quality and have been proposed as a potential metric to compare surgeon performance. However, there are over 25 different PROs for shoulder and elbow conditions. Therefore, the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Value Committee was established to recommend shoulder and elbow PROs in an effort to align their implementation for quality assessment. The committee developed criteria for assessing the outcome measures including that each measure should be patient reported, not requiring clinician input; have published validation and psychometrics; and be standardized and demonstrate ease of use for the patient and clinician. Two sets were suggested: one set for clinical implementation and a more robust set for research purposes. The final recommendation was that all patients should complete the Veterans Rand 12 for general health and the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation for the specified body region. For patients with shoulder complaints, the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score was recommended, and for those with elbow complaints, the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score was recommended. More robust disease-specific measures were provided for research purposes. Continued efforts should be made to align these measures across orthopedics to facilitate use of patient outcome measures as a component of value-based health care assessment.

Keywords: Shoulder outcomes; elbow outcomes; implementation; interpretation of outcomes; patient-centered outcomes; selection.