Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2017 Dec 1;114(48):815-821.
doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2017.0815.

Non-Pharmacological Treatment in People With Cognitive Impairment

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Non-Pharmacological Treatment in People With Cognitive Impairment

Melanie Straubmeier et al. Dtsch Arztebl Int. .

Abstract

Background: A number of non-pharmacological methods are available to help elderly people with cognitive impairment. Unstructured and non-evidencebased interventions are commonly used. The multicomponent therapy MAKS (a German acronym for Motor, Activities of daily living, Cognitive, Social) has already been evaluated in nursing homes; in this study, we investigated its use in day care centers (DCCs).

Methods: A cluster-randomized, controlled, single-blinded trial involving a 6-month intervention phase was performed. 362 cognitively impaired persons in 32 DCCs took part in the trial. Multiple regression analyses were used to determine whether MAKS therapy led to any statistically significant and clinically relevant improvement over time (compared to membership in the control group) in these persons' cognitive abilities and activities of daily living (ADL) abilities, as assessed, respectively, with the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and the Erlangen Test of Activities of Daily Living in Persons with Mild Dementia or Mild Cognitive Impairment (ETAM). A primary per-protocol analysis was supplemented by an intention-to-treat analysis. Two secondary outcomes (social behavior and neuropsychiatric symptoms) were analyzed exploratively as well. Study registration: ISRCTN16412551.

Results: In the primary per-protocol analysis at 6 months, the intervention group had significantly better MMSE and ETAM scores than the control group (Cohen's d, 0.26 and 0.21, respectively; p = 0.012 for both). The same was found in the ITT analysis at 6 months (Cohen's d = 0.21, p = 0.033; and Cohen's d = 0.20, p = 0.019, respectively). Neuropsychiatric symptoms, one of the secondary outcomes, also evolved more favorably in the intervention group (Cohen's d = 0.23, p = 0.055).

Conclusion: MAKS therapy is effective for persons with cognitive impairment ranging from mild cognitive impairment (MCI) to moderate dementia who live at home and regularly visit a day care center. The fact that 32 day care facilities from all over Germany participated in this study gives its findings high external validity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram according to CONSORT statement: cluster-randomization, baseline, dropouts, follow-up. CONSORT, Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials; MAKS, Motor, Activities of daily living, Cognitive, Social (German acronym)
Figure 2
Figure 2
Changes in cognitive abilities over time in DeTaMAKS intervention and control groups versus untreated progression (based on the literature) *Decrease in cognitive abilities (MMSE) during untreated progression before beginning of dementia medication with an assumed baseline score of 19.6; in this sample, this score corresponds to the mean in the control group at time t0. The decrease in MMSE score of 3 points per year shown here is taken from the study that shows progression without intervention, which uses MMSE as a measure of cognition and best matches our research in terms of target group and setting (day care centers) (18). Other publications describe comparable cognitive decreases (19). DeTaMAKS, Dementia day care MAKS; MAKS, Motor, Activities of daily living, Cognitive, Social (German acronym); MMSE, Mini–Mental State Examination

References

    1. Schwinger A, Jürchott K, Tsiasioti C, Rehbein I. Pflegebedürftigkeit in Deutschland Pflege-Report 2016 Schwerpunkt: Die Pflegenden im Fokus. In: Jacobs K, Kuhlmey A, Greß S, Klauber J, Schwinger A, editors. Schattauer. Stuttgart: 2016.
    1. Schacke C, Zank SR. Measuring the effectiveness of adult day care as a facility to support family caregivers of dementia patients. J Appl Gerontol. 2006;65:65–81.
    1. Fields NL, Anderson KA, Dabelko-Schoeny H. The effectiveness of adult day services for older adults: a review of the literature from 2000 to 2011. J Appl Gerontol. 2014;33:130–163. - PubMed
    1. Mossello E, Caleri V, Razzi E, et al. Day care for older dementia patients: favorable effects on behavioral and psychological symptoms and caregiver stress. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2008;23:1066–1072. - PubMed
    1. Olazarán J, Reisberg B, Clare L, et al. Nonpharmacological therapies in Alzheimer’s disease: a systematic review of efficacy. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2010;30:161–178. - PubMed

Publication types