Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Nov 22:6:2040.
doi: 10.12688/f1000research.12225.1. eCollection 2017.

Patients with uninjured lungs may also benefit from lung-protective ventilator settings

Affiliations
Review

Patients with uninjured lungs may also benefit from lung-protective ventilator settings

Roger Alencar et al. F1000Res. .

Abstract

Although mechanical ventilation is a life-saving strategy in critically ill patients and an indispensable tool in patients under general anesthesia for surgery, it also acts as a double-edged sword. Indeed, ventilation is increasingly recognized as a potentially dangerous intrusion that has the potential to harm lungs, in a condition known as 'ventilator-induced lung injury' (VILI). So-called 'lung-protective' ventilator settings aiming at prevention of VILI have been shown to improve outcomes in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), and, over the last few years, there has been increasing interest in possible benefit of lung-protective ventilation in patients under ventilation for reasons other than ARDS. Patients without ARDS could benefit from tidal volume reduction during mechanical ventilation. However, it is uncertain whether higher levels of positive end-expiratory pressure could benefit these patients as well. Finally, recent evidence suggests that patients without ARDS should receive low driving pressures during ventilation.

Keywords: acute respiratory distress syndrome; lung-protective ventilator; ventilator–induced lung injury.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No competing interests were disclosed.No competing interests were disclosed.No competing interests were disclosed.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Slutsky AS, Ranieri VM: Ventilator-induced lung injury. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(22):2126–36. 10.1056/NEJMra1208707 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Serpa Neto A, Schultz MJ, Slutsky AS: Current concepts of protective ventilation during general anaesthesia. Swiss Med Wkly. 2015;145:w14211. 10.4414/smw.2015.14211 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Güldner A, Kiss T, Serpa Neto A, et al. : Intraoperative protective mechanical ventilation for prevention of postoperative pulmonary complications: a comprehensive review of the role of tidal volume, positive end-expiratory pressure, and lung recruitment maneuvers. Anesthesiology. 2015;123(3):692–713. 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000754 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network, Brower RG, Matthay MA, et al. : Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2000;342(18):1301–8. 10.1056/NEJM200005043421801 - DOI - PubMed
    2. F1000 Recommendation

    1. Bellani G, Laffey JG, Pham T, et al. : Epidemiology, Patterns of Care, and Mortality for Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Intensive Care Units in 50 Countries. JAMA. 2016;315(8):788–800. 10.1001/jama.2016.0291 - DOI - PubMed
    2. F1000 Recommendation

LinkOut - more resources