Cigarette Design Features: Effects on Emission Levels, User Perception, and Behavior
- PMID: 29250577
- PMCID: PMC5730088
- DOI: 10.18001/TRS.4.1.6
Cigarette Design Features: Effects on Emission Levels, User Perception, and Behavior
Abstract
Objectives: This paper describes the effects of non-tobacco, physical cigarette design features on smoke emissions, product appeal, and smoking behaviors - 3 factors that determine smoker's exposure and related health risks.
Methods: We reviewed available evidence for the impact of filter ventilation, new filter types, and cigarettes dimensions on toxic emissions, smoker's perceptions, and behavior. For evidence sources we used scientific literature and websites providing product characteristics and marketing information.
Results: Whereas filter ventilation results in lower machine-generated emissions, it also leads to perceptions of lighter taste and relative safety in smokers who can unwittingly employ more intense smoking behavior to obtain the desired amount of nicotine and sensory appeal. Filter additives that modify smoke emissions can also modify sensory cues, resulting in changes in smoking behavior. Flavor capsules increase the cigarette's appeal and novelty, and lead to misperceptions of reduced harm. Slim cigarettes have lower yields of some smoke emissions, but smoking behavior can be more intense than with standard cigarettes.
Conclusions: Physical design features significantly impact machine-measured emission yields in cigarette smoke, product appeal, smoking behaviors, and exposures in smokers. The influence of current and emerging design features is important in understanding the effectiveness of regulatory actions to reduce smoking-related harm.
Keywords: cigarette design; cigarette emissions; cigarette user perception and behavior; filter type; filter ventilation; smoking.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of Interest Statement Nothing to declare.
Similar articles
-
The analysis of mainstream smoke emissions of Canadian 'super slim' cigarettes.Tob Control. 2013 Nov;22(6):e10. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050450. Epub 2012 Jul 20. Tob Control. 2013. PMID: 22821751
-
Limitations in the characterisation of cigarette products using different machine smoking regimes.Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2010 Dec;58(3):501-15. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2010.08.022. Epub 2010 Aug 31. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2010. PMID: 20807558
-
Approaches for the design of reduced toxicant emission cigarettes.Springerplus. 2014 Jul 22;3:374. doi: 10.1186/2193-1801-3-374. eCollection 2014. Springerplus. 2014. PMID: 25110628 Free PMC article.
-
Smoking behaviour and compensation: a review of the literature.Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1999 Jul;145(1):1-20. doi: 10.1007/s002130051027. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1999. PMID: 10445368 Review.
-
Cigarette filter ventilation is a defective design because of misleading taste, bigger puffs, and blocked vents.Tob Control. 2002 Mar;11 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):I40-50. doi: 10.1136/tc.11.suppl_1.i40. Tob Control. 2002. PMID: 11893814 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Protecting public health and the environment: towards a general ban on cellulose acetate cigarette filters in the European Union.Front Public Health. 2023 Oct 31;11:1282655. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1282655. eCollection 2023. Front Public Health. 2023. PMID: 38026410 Free PMC article.
-
Smokers Awareness and Risk Perceptions of Filter Ventilation.Tob Regul Sci. 2020 May;6(3):213-223. doi: 10.18001/trs.6.3.6. Tob Regul Sci. 2020. PMID: 38957357 Free PMC article.
-
Nicotine and addiction beliefs and perceptions among the US-born and foreign-born populations.Prev Med. 2018 Sep;114:107-114. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.06.018. Epub 2018 Jun 26. Prev Med. 2018. PMID: 29958861 Free PMC article.
-
Assessing cigarette packaging and labelling policy effects on early adolescents: results from a discrete choice experiment.Tob Control. 2020 Jul 14:tobaccocontrol-2019-055463. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2019-055463. Online ahead of print. Tob Control. 2020. PMID: 32665358 Free PMC article.
-
Is perception reality? Associations among "light" cigarettes and number of cigarettes smoked per day.Drug Alcohol Depend. 2023 Mar 1;244:109709. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2022.109709. Epub 2023 Jan 13. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2023. PMID: 36642000 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Eriksen M, Mackay J, Ross H. The Tobacco Atlas. Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society; 2012.
-
- World Health Organization. Partial Guidelines for the Implementation of Articles 9 and 10 of the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control. [Accessed August 25, 2017]; Available at: http://www.who.int/fctc/guidelines/Guideliness_Articles_9_10_rev_240613.pdf.
-
- World Health Organization. The Scientific Basis of Tobacco Product Regulation : Report of a WHO Study Ggroup. WHO Technical Report Series no. 945. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2007. - PubMed
-
- Borland R, Yong HH, King B, et al. Use of and beliefs about light cigarettes in four countries: findings from the International Tobacco Control Policy Evaluation Survey. Nicotine Tob Res. 2004;6(Suppl. 3):S311–S321. - PubMed
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials