Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comment
. 2017 Dec 18:6:e33312.
doi: 10.7554/eLife.33312.

Culture shock

Affiliations
Comment

Culture shock

Antoine Molaro et al. Elife. .

Abstract

Many different human cell lines, including both normal and cancer cells, appear to converge to a state that contains an unusual number of chromosomes when they are grown in culture.

Keywords: autosomes; cancer cell line; dosage compensation; evolutionary biology; genomics; multicellularity; sex chromsome evolution; unicellularity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No competing interests declared.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. The evolution of human cells in culture.
In humans, female cells have 22 pairs of chromosomes, an active X chromosome (Xa) and an inactive X chromosome (Xi), whereas male cells have 22 pairs of chromosomes, an X chromosome and a Y chromosome. Cells derived from human cancers often are aneuploid and contain altered numbers of chromosomes, which have frequently undergone rearrangements from the canonical state. However, when grown in cell culture, both female and male cells (and also both normal and cancer-derived cells) can evolve into a ‘de-sexualized state’ that contains a single X chromosome. In these de-sexualized cells, the X chromosome frequently undergoes a duplication, which is followed by the duplication of one full set of autosomal chromosomes to produce an X:A=2:3 state that contains 68 chromosomes on average (as opposed to 46); this state appears to have been repeatedly selected for in cell culture conditions.

Comment on

References

    1. Bachtrog D, Mank JE, Peichel CL, Kirkpatrick M, Otto SP, Ashman TL, Hahn MW, Kitano J, Mayrose I, Ming R, Perrin N, Ross L, Valenzuela N, Vamosi JC, Tree of Sex Consortium Sex determination: why so many ways of doing it? PLoS Biology. 2014;12:e1001899. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001899. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bachtrog D. Y-chromosome evolution: emerging insights into processes of Y-chromosome degeneration. Nature Reviews Genetics. 2013;14:113–124. doi: 10.1038/nrg3366. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Charlesworth B. The evolution of sex chromosomes. Science. 1991;251:1030–1033. doi: 10.1126/science.1998119. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chen H, He X. The convergent cancer evolution toward a single cellular destination. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 2016;33:4–12. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msv212. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chen H, Lin F, Xing K, He X. The reverse evolution from multicellularity to unicellularity during carcinogenesis. Nature Communications. 2015;6:6367. doi: 10.1038/ncomms7367. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources