Disparities and change over time in distance women would need to travel to have an abortion in the USA: a spatial analysis
- PMID: 29253373
- PMCID: PMC5943037
- DOI: 10.1016/S2468-2667(17)30158-5
Disparities and change over time in distance women would need to travel to have an abortion in the USA: a spatial analysis
Abstract
Background: Abortion can help women to control their fertility and is an important component of health care for women. Although women in the USA who live further from an abortion clinic are less likely to obtain an abortion than women who live closer to an abortion clinic, no national study has examined inequality in access to abortion and whether inequality has increased as the number of abortion clinics has declined.
Methods: For this analysis, we obtained data on abortion clinics for 2000, 2011, and 2014 from the Guttmacher Institute's Abortion Provider Census. Block groups and the percentage of women aged 15-44 years by census tract were obtained from the US Census Bureau. Distance to the nearest clinic was calculated for the population-weighted centroid of every block group. We calculated the median distance to an abortion clinic for women in each county and the median and 80th percentile distances for each state by weighting block groups by the number of women of reproductive age (15-44 years).
Findings: In 2014, women in the USA would have had to travel a median distance of 10·79 miles (17·36 km) to reach the nearest abortion clinic, although 20% of women would have had to travel 42·54 miles (68·46 km) or more. We found substantially greater variation within than between states because, even in mostly rural states, women and clinics were concentrated in urban areas. We identified spatial disparities in abortion access, which were broadly unchanged, at least as far back as 2000.
Interpretation: We showed substantial and persistent spatial disparities in access to abortion in the USA. These results contribute to an emerging literature documenting similar disparities in other high-income countries.
Funding: An anonymous grant to the Guttmacher Institute.
Copyright © 2017 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
We declare no competing interests.
Figures
Comment in
-
Innovative models are needed for equitable abortion access in the USA.Lancet Public Health. 2017 Nov;2(11):e484-e485. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(17)30181-0. Epub 2017 Oct 3. Lancet Public Health. 2017. PMID: 29253369 No abstract available.
References
-
- Committee on Health Care for Underserved Women. ACOG Committee opinion no 613: increasing access to abortion. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;124:1060–65. - PubMed
-
- American Public Health Association. Restricted access to abortion violates human rights, precludes reproductive justice, and demands public health intervention. [accessed Dec 13, 2016];Policy number 20152. 2015 https://www.apha.org/policies-and-advocacy/public-health-policy-statemen....
-
- Shelton JD, Brann EA, Schulz KF. Abortion utilization: does travel distance matter? Fam Plann Perspect. 1976;8:260–62. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
