Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jan 2;115(1):104-108.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1708414115. Epub 2017 Dec 18.

Gender disparities in colloquium speakers at top universities

Affiliations

Gender disparities in colloquium speakers at top universities

Christine L Nittrouer et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. .

Abstract

Colloquium talks at prestigious universities both create and reflect academic researchers' reputations. Gender disparities in colloquium talks can arise through a variety of mechanisms. The current study examines gender differences in colloquium speakers at 50 prestigious US colleges and universities in 2013-2014. Using archival data, we analyzed 3,652 talks in six academic disciplines. Men were more likely than women to be colloquium speakers even after controlling for the gender and rank of the available speakers. Eliminating alternative explanations (e.g., women declining invitations more often than men), our follow-up data revealed that female and male faculty at top universities reported no differences in the extent to which they (i) valued and (ii) turned down speaking engagements. Additional data revealed that the presence of women as colloquium chairs (and potentially on colloquium committees) increased the likelihood of women appearing as colloquium speakers. Our data suggest that those who invite and schedule speakers serve as gender gatekeepers with the power to create or reduce gender differences in academic reputations.

Keywords: academia; colloquia; gatekeepers; gender bias; professional recognition.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Study 1: Percentage of male and female speakers out of the available pool by department giving colloquium talks.

References

    1. Vest CM, Birgeneau RJ, Bailyn L. 1999 A study on the status of women faculty in science at MIT. The MIT Faculty Newsletter: Available at web.mit.edu/fnl/women/women.pdf. Accessed May 19, 2017.
    1. Murphy K. 2016 Stanford and other elite universities have a gender problem: Too few women professors. The Mercury News. Available at www.mercurynews.com/ci_29567505/stanford-and-other-elite-universities-ha.... Accessed May 19, 2017.
    1. EEOC 2009 Federal laws prohibiting job discrimination questions and answers. US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Available at https://www.eeoc.gov/facts/qanda.html. Accessed May 19, 2017.
    1. Valian V. Why So Slow? The Advancement of Women. MIT Press; Cambridge, MA: 1998.
    1. Ceci SJ, Ginther DK, Kahn S, Williams WM. Women in academic science: A changing landscape. Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2014;15:75–141. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources