Are the Editors Responsible for Our Obsession with the Impact Factor?
- PMID: 29259087
- PMCID: PMC5736912
- DOI: 10.1128/mBio.02019-17
Are the Editors Responsible for Our Obsession with the Impact Factor?
Keywords: editors; impact factor; scientific publication.
Comment in
-
Reply to Argüelles and Argüelles-Prieto, "Are the Editors Responsible for Our Obsession with the Impact Factor?".mBio. 2017 Dec 19;8(6):e02079-17. doi: 10.1128/mBio.02079-17. mBio. 2017. PMID: 29259091 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Comment on
-
Causes for the persistence of impact factor mania.mBio. 2014 Mar 18;5(2):e00064-14. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00064-14. mBio. 2014. PMID: 24643863 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Impacted science: impact is not importance.mBio. 2015 Oct 13;6(5):e01593-15. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01593-15. mBio. 2015. PMID: 26463169 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Garfield E. 2007. The evolution of the Science Citation Index. Int Microbiol 10:65–69. - PubMed
-
- Argüelles JC. 2000. The corollary of scientific research: “publish or be damned.” Int Microbiol 3:193–194. - PubMed
-
- Casadevall A, Bertuzzi S, Buchmeier MJ, Davis RJ, Drake H, Fang FC, Gilbert J, Goldman BM, Imperiale MJ, Matsumura P, McAdam AJ, Pasetti MF, Sandri-Goldin RM, Silhavy T, Rice L, Young JA, Shenk T. 2016. ASM journals eliminate impact factor information from journal websites. mBio 7:e01150-16. doi:10.1128/mBio.01150-16. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources