Early cancer diagnoses through BRCA1/2 screening of unselected adult biobank participants
- PMID: 29261187
- PMCID: PMC5930270
- DOI: 10.1038/gim.2017.145
Early cancer diagnoses through BRCA1/2 screening of unselected adult biobank participants
Erratum in
-
Correction to: Early cancer diagnoses through BRCA1/2 screening of unselected adult biobank participants.Genet Med. 2021 Dec;23(12):2470. doi: 10.1038/s41436-021-01304-9. Genet Med. 2021. PMID: 34646007 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Abstract
PurposeThe clinical utility of screening unselected individuals for pathogenic BRCA1/2 variants has not been established. Data on cancer risk management behaviors and diagnoses of BRCA1/2-associated cancers can help inform assessments of clinical utility.MethodsWhole-exome sequences of participants in the MyCode Community Health Initiative were reviewed for pathogenic/likely pathogenic BRCA1/2 variants. Clinically confirmed variants were disclosed to patient-participants and their clinicians. We queried patient-participants' electronic health records for BRCA1/2-associated cancer diagnoses and risk management that occurred within 12 months after results disclosure, and calculated the percentage of patient-participants of eligible age who had begun risk management.ResultsThirty-seven MyCode patient-participants were unaware of their pathogenic/likely pathogenic BRCA1/2 variant, had not had a BRCA1/2-associated cancer, and had 12 months of follow-up. Of the 33 who were of an age to begin BRCA1/2-associated risk management, 26 (79%) had performed at least one such procedure. Three were diagnosed with an early-stage, BRCA1/2-associated cancer-including a stage 1C fallopian tube cancer-via these procedures.ConclusionScreening for pathogenic BRCA1/2 variants among unselected individuals can lead to occult cancer detection shortly after disclosure. Comprehensive outcomes data generated within our learning healthcare system will aid in determining whether population-wide BRCA1/2 genomic screening programs offer clinical utility.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest as relates to the content in this article.
Figures


References
-
- CDC. Public Health Genomics—Genomic Tests and Family History by Levels of Evidence.2014. https://www.cdc.gov/genomics/implementation/toolkit/tier1.htm.Accessed 28 April 2015.
-
- Nelson HD, Pappas M, Zakher B, Mitchell JP, Okinaka-Hu L, Fu R. Risk assessment, genetic counseling, and genetic testing for BRCA-related cancer in women: a systematic review to update the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation. Ann Intern Med. 2014;160:255–266. doi: 10.7326/M13-1684. - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous