Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017;10(1):1413917.
doi: 10.1080/16549716.2017.1413917.

Using social autopsy to understand maternal, newborn, and child mortality in low-resource settings: a systematic review of the literature

Cheryl A Moyer  1   2 , Cassidy Johnson  2 , Elizabeth Kaselitz  2 , Raymond Aborigo  3
Affiliations

Using social autopsy to understand maternal, newborn, and child mortality in low-resource settings: a systematic review of the literature

Cheryl A Moyer et al. Glob Health Action. 2017.

Abstract

Background: Social, cultural, and behavioral factors are often potent upstream contributors to maternal, neonatal, and child mortality, especially in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Social autopsy is one method of identifying the impact of such factors, yet it is unclear how social autopsy methods are being used in LMICs.

Objective: This study aimed to identify the most common social autopsy instruments, describe overarching findings across populations and geography, and identify gaps in the existing social autopsy literature.

Methods: A systematic search of the peer-reviewed literature from 2005 to 2016 was conducted. Studies were included if they were conducted in an LMIC, focused on maternal/neonatal/infant/child health, reported on the results of original research, and explicitly mentioned the use of a social autopsy tool.

Results: Sixteen articles out of 1950 citations were included, representing research conducted in 11 countries. Five different tools were described, with two primary conceptual frameworks used to guide analysis: Pathway to Survival and Three Delays models. Studies varied in methods for identifying deaths, and recall periods for respondents ranged from 6 weeks to 5+ years. Across studies, recognition of danger signs appeared to be high, while subsequent care-seeking was inconsistent. Cost, distance to facility, and transportation issues were frequently cited barriers to care-seeking, however, additional barriers were reported that varied by location. Gaps in the social autopsy literature include the lack of: harmonized tools and analytical methods that allow for cross-study comparisons, discussion of complexity of decision making for care seeking, qualitative narratives that address inconsistencies in responses, and the explicit inclusion of perspectives from husbands and fathers.

Conclusion: Despite the nascence of the field, research across 11 countries has included social autopsy methods, using a variety of tools, sampling methods, and analytical frameworks to determine how social factors impact maternal, neonatal, and child health outcomes.

Keywords: Social autopsy; developing countries; infant mortality; maternal mortality; neonatal mortality; verbal autopsy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
PRISMA flow diagram (adapted from Moher et al. 2009).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Waiswa P, Kalter HD, Jakob R, Black RE for the Social Autopsy Working Group . Increased use of social autopsy is needed to improve maternal, neonatal and child health programmes in low-income countries. Bull World Health Organ. 2012;90:1–15. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kalter HD, Salgado R, Babille M, et al. Social autopsy for maternal and child deaths: a comprehensive literature review to examine the concept and the development of the method. Popul Health Metr. 2011. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Moyer CA, Aborigo R, Logonia G, et al. Clean delivery practices in rural northern Ghana: a qualitative study of community and provider knowledge, attitudes, and belief systems. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2012;12, PMID: 22703032 Available from: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2393/12/50/doi:10.1186/1471-2393-12-50 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6:e1000097. - PMC - PubMed
    1. National Institutes of Health, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies; [cited 2017. October 31] Available from: https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health-pro/guidelines/in-develop/cardiovascula...

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources