Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Book

Tubal Sterilization

In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan.
.
Affiliations
Free Books & Documents
Book

Tubal Sterilization

Sarah Marino et al.
Free Books & Documents

Excerpt

Tubal sterilization is the intentional occlusion or partial or complete removal of the fallopian tubes to provide permanent contraception in females. Sterilization is highly effective at preventing pregnancy and is the most commonly used form of contraception worldwide. The procedure is indicated when it is desired by the patient for permanent contraception. It can be performed at any time during the menstrual cycle, during cesarean delivery, and in the immediate postpartum and postabortal periods. A large percentage of sterilization procedures worldwide are performed in the immediate postpartum period, including nearly half of all sterilization procedures performed in the US. Procedures performed outside of the immediate postpartum or postabortal period are known as interval procedures. Presently, tubal sterilization is performed laparoscopically or through a mini-laparotomy. Previously, hysteroscopic devices have also been used; however, these devices are no longer available.

Traditionally, interval sterilization was most often accomplished by laparoscopically occluding the tubes with clips, bands, or electrocautery, while postpartum sterilization was typically accomplished via partial salpingectomy through a mini-laparotomy. More recently, however, complete bilateral salpingectomy has become the sterilization procedure of choice during interval and postpartum procedures because it decreases the risk of epithelial ovarian cancer and post-sterilization contraceptive failure compared with traditional sterilization techniques without increasing surgical risk. A 2023 study comparing opportunistic salpingectomy to standard bilateral tubal ligation following vaginal delivery showed that for every 10,000 patients, "salpingectomy would result in 25 fewer ovarian cancer cases, 19 fewer ovarian cancer deaths, and 116 fewer unintended pregnancies than tubal ligation."

During the consent process, clinicians should stress to patients that this procedure is intended to be permanent and that reversal is not always possible. Young age at the time of sterilization is the strongest predictor of regret, with the probability of regret estimated to be between 12 and 20% in individuals sterilized before age 30. To minimize this risk, the entire spectrum of alternative contraceptive options should be reviewed with the patient, with an emphasis on long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs), including the intrauterine device (IUD) and contraceptive implant, both of which have efficacy rates similar to traditional tubal sterilization techniques. For patients in a monogamous relationship with a single male partner, vasectomy is another essential alternative to consider because the procedure is associated with lower risks than tubal sterilization.

Although rare, post-sterilization pregnancy can occur. The cumulative 10-year failure rate of tubal sterilization using traditional occlusive methods or postpartum partial salpingectomy ranges from 7.5 to 54.3 pregnancies per 1,000 sterilization procedures, depending on the technique used and the age of the patient at sterilization, with younger ages being associated with higher rates of contraceptive failure. Of note, data on the long-term failure rates of complete bilateral salpingectomy are not yet available, but rates should theoretically approach zero. If post-sterilization pregnancy occurs, there is a relatively high risk of a resulting ectopic pregnancy. As with any surgical procedure, other procedural risks include bleeding, infection, injury to nearby organs, and wound and anesthesia complications. Therefore, due to the importance of permanent sterilization on women's health, healthcare professionals should recognize the indications and contraindications for tubal sterilization; the risks, benefits, and complications of the procedure; the techniques available to perform this mode of sterilization; and the role of the interprofessional team in caring for patients who undergo the type of surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure: Sarah Marino declares no relevant financial relationships with ineligible companies.

Disclosure: Christinne Canela declares no relevant financial relationships with ineligible companies.

Disclosure: Suzanne Jenkins declares no relevant financial relationships with ineligible companies.

Disclosure: Noor Nama declares no relevant financial relationships with ineligible companies.

References

    1. Clark NV, Endicott SP, Jorgensen EM, Hur HC, Lockrow EG, Kern ME, Jones-Cox CE, Dunlow SG, Einarsson JI, Cohen SL. Review of Sterilization Techniques and Clinical Updates. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2018 Nov-Dec;25(7):1157-1164. - PubMed
    1. Gariepy AM, Lewis C, Zuckerman D, Tancredi DJ, Murphy E, McDonald-Mosley R, Sonalkar S, Hathaway M, Nunez-Eddy C, Schwarz EB. Comparative effectiveness of hysteroscopic and laparoscopic sterilization for women: a retrospective cohort study. Fertil Steril. 2022 Jun;117(6):1322-1331. - PubMed
    1. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 208 Summary: Benefits and Risks of Sterilization. Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Mar;133(3):592-594. - PubMed
    1. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists' Committee on Practice Bulletins—Gynecology. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 208: Benefits and Risks of Sterilization. Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Mar;133(3):e194-e207. - PubMed
    1. Access to Postpartum Sterilization: ACOG Committee Opinion, Number 827. Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Jun 01;137(6):e169-e176. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources