Tensa retraction cholesteatoma: treatment and long-term results
- PMID: 2926259
- DOI: 10.1017/s0022215100108321
Tensa retraction cholesteatoma: treatment and long-term results
Abstract
To obtain the best possible results of treatment of acquired cholesteatoma, we made a subdivision of cholesteatoma types into attic and pars tensa cholesteatomas, and subdivided the latter further into tensa retraction cholesteatoma and sinus cholesteatomas. Tensa retraction cholesteatoma is defined as arising from a retraction or perforation of the whole pars tensa, whereas sinus cholesteatoma is defined as arising from a retraction or perforation of the postero-superior part of the tensa. We present the long-term results obtained in tensa retraction cholesteatomas treated with one stage surgery from 1964 to 1980. Median observation time was 9 years, range 2 to 19 years. Sixty-one ears were treated without mastoidectomy, whereas 71 ears had canal wall-up mastoidectomy and 64 ears had canal wall-down mastoidectomy. The total recurrence rate was 13.3 per cent; 17 ears had residual cholesteatoma, and nine ears had recurrent cholesteatoma. The best results were obtained in ears with an intact ossicular chain where mastoidectomy was not performed. In 49 per cent of the cases, the cholesteatoma was confined to the tympanic cavity without reaching the aditus, antrum or mastoid process. About one-third to one-quarter of the ears had tympanoplasty only, with removal of the cholesteatoma through the ear canal.
Similar articles
-
Treatment of sinus cholesteatoma. Long-term results and recurrence rate.Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1988 Dec;114(12):1428-34. doi: 10.1001/archotol.1988.01860240078028. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1988. PMID: 3190871
-
Late results of surgery in different cholesteatoma types.ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 1989;51(1):33-49. doi: 10.1159/000276030. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 1989. PMID: 2710533
-
Long-term results of surgical treatment in different cholesteatoma types.Am J Otol. 1993 Sep;14(5):507-11. doi: 10.1097/00129492-199309000-00017. Am J Otol. 1993. PMID: 8122717
-
Treatment of cholesteatoma and retraction pockets.Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 1993;250(4):193-9. doi: 10.1007/BF00171523. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 1993. PMID: 8369113 Review.
-
Cholesteatoma surgery: canal wall down procedures.Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1988 Jan-Feb;97(1):30-5. doi: 10.1177/000348948809700106. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1988. PMID: 3277524 Review.
Cited by
-
Tympanic membrane retraction pocket staging: is it worthwhile?Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2014 Jun;271(6):1361-8. doi: 10.1007/s00405-013-2644-4. Epub 2013 Jul 27. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2014. PMID: 23892691 Review.
-
Endoscopic Management of Pediatric Cholesteatoma.J Otol. 2020 Mar;15(1):17-26. doi: 10.1016/j.joto.2018.11.009. Epub 2018 Dec 3. J Otol. 2020. PMID: 32110236 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Hearing outcome after sequential cholesteatoma surgery.Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016 Aug;273(8):2035-46. doi: 10.1007/s00405-015-3767-6. Epub 2015 Sep 3. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016. PMID: 26335290
-
Updates and knowledge gaps in cholesteatoma research.Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:854024. doi: 10.1155/2015/854024. Epub 2015 Mar 18. Biomed Res Int. 2015. PMID: 25866816 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Cholesteatoma in children. An Egyptian overview.Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 1992;249(7):389-92. doi: 10.1007/BF00192260. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 1992. PMID: 1489537
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical
Miscellaneous