[Clinically predictive factors of Gleason score upgrading in patients after radical prostatectomy]
- PMID: 29263497
[Clinically predictive factors of Gleason score upgrading in patients after radical prostatectomy]
Abstract
Objective: To assess the discrepancy between preoperative needle biopsy (NB) Gleason score and pathological specimen Gleason score (GS) after radical prostatectomy, and to explore the risk factors of postoperative upgrading of GS.
Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 160 patients who suffered from biopsy proved prostatic carcinoma and performed radical prostatectomy. Age of the patients was 57-82 years, with the average age of 71.6; prebiopsy prostate specific antigen (PSA) was 0.31-40.32 μg/L,with the average PSA of 11.29 μg/L; body mass index (BMI) was 16.41-32.04 kg/m2, with the average BMI of 23.63 kg/m2; prostate volume (PV) was 9.52-148.46 mL, with the average PV of 40.19 mL. All the patients included in the study had complete information for clinical variables, including age, BMI, prebiopsy PSA level, PV, number of biopsy cores obtained, percentage, clinical stage, and biopsy GS. Grading of NB Gleason score was compared with their corresponding radical prostatectomy specimens, and the discrepancy between the NB and prostatectomy specimens GS assessed. Upgrading was defined as any increase in the pathological GS over that of the biopsy GS as a total sum of primary and secondary grades or a change in the order of primary and secondary grades towards higher ones. Univariable and multivariable Logistic regression analyses were used to identify predictors of pathological grading changes.
Results: Of the 160 patients, the specimen GS was upgraded in 49 (30.6%) patients and remained with no change in 82 (51.3%) patients. Univariate and multivariate regression analysis showed that prostate volume and biopsy GS were independent predictors with postoperative upgrading of GS. Age, BMI, PSA before needle biopsy, clinical stage and needle number showed no statistical significance (P>0.05).
Conclusion: Lower biopsy GS and smaller prostate volume are increased risks for clinically upgrading of GS after radical prostatectomy. This fact should be kept in mind when deciding on therapy decisions for patients with prostate cancer.
Similar articles
-
The Discrepancy between Needle Biopsy and Radical Prostatectomy Gleason Score in Patients with Prostate Cancer.Urol J. 2020 Aug 4;18(4):395-399. doi: 10.22037/uj.v16i7.5985. Urol J. 2020. PMID: 32798231
-
Clinical and pathologic predictors of Gleason sum upgrading in patients after radical prostatectomy: results from a single institution series.Urol Oncol. 2011 Sep-Oct;29(5):508-14. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2009.07.003. Epub 2009 Oct 17. Urol Oncol. 2011. PMID: 19837614 Clinical Trial.
-
The percent of cores positive for cancer in prostate needle biopsy specimens is strongly predictive of tumor stage and volume at radical prostatectomy.J Urol. 2000 Jan;163(1):174-8. J Urol. 2000. PMID: 10604340 Clinical Trial.
-
Prostate Volume is A Predictor of Gleason Score Upgrading after Radical Prostatectomy in Low-Risk Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Urol J. 2024 Feb 28;21(1):20-28. doi: 10.22037/uj.v20i.7796. Urol J. 2024. PMID: 38087971
-
Predictive Factors for Gleason Score Upgrading in Patients with Prostate Cancer after Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Urol Int. 2023;107(5):460-479. doi: 10.1159/000528873. Epub 2023 Mar 29. Urol Int. 2023. PMID: 36990065
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous