Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jun 1:2:15.
doi: 10.1038/s41541-017-0016-6. eCollection 2017.

An avian influenza H7 DNA priming vaccine is safe and immunogenic in a randomized phase I clinical trial

Affiliations

An avian influenza H7 DNA priming vaccine is safe and immunogenic in a randomized phase I clinical trial

Adam D DeZure et al. NPJ Vaccines. .

Abstract

A novel avian influenza subtype, A/H7N9, emerged in 2013 and represents a public health threat with pandemic potential. We have previously shown that DNA vaccine priming increases the magnitude and quality of antibody responses to H5N1 monovalent inactivated boost. We now report the safety and immunogenicity of a H7 DNA-H7N9 monovalent inactivated vaccine prime-boost regimen. In this Phase 1, open label, randomized clinical trial, we evaluated three H7N9 vaccination regimens in healthy adults, with a prime-boost interval of 16 weeks. Group 1 received H7 DNA vaccine prime and H7N9 monovalent inactivated vaccine boost. Group 2 received H7 DNA and H7N9 monovalent inactivated vaccine as a prime and H7N9 monovalent inactivated vaccine as a boost. Group 3 received H7N9 monovalent inactivated vaccine in a homologous prime-boost regimen. Overall, 30 individuals between 20 to 60 years old enrolled and 28 completed both vaccinations. All injections were well tolerated with no serious adverse events. 2 weeks post-boost, 50% of Group 1 and 33% of Group 2 achieved a HAI titer ≥1:40 compared with 11% of Group 3. Also, at least a fourfold increase in neutralizing antibody responses was seen in 90% of Group 1, 100% of Group 2, and 78% of Group 3 subjects. Peak neutralizing antibody geometric mean titers were significantly greater for Group 1 (GMT = 440.61, p < 0.05) and Group 2 (GMT = 331, p = 0.02) when compared with Group 3 (GMT = 86.11). A novel H7 DNA vaccine was safe, well-tolerated, and immunogenic when boosted with H7N9 monovalent inactivated vaccine, while priming for higher HAI and neutralizing antibody titers than H7N9 monovalent inactivated vaccine alone.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing financial interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
CONSORT flow diagram of the trial. Consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT) diagram delineates study enrollment of 30 subjects who were randomized to three study groups
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Induction of H7-specific antibodies following three different prime-boost regimens. HAI = hemagglutination inhibition assay. Geometric mean titers and 95% confidence intervals are shown 2 weeks following H7N9 boost vaccination. Group 1 received H7 DNA at day 0 and H7N9 MIV at week 16. Group 2 received both H7 DNA and H7N9 MIV prime at day 0 and H7N9 MIV at week 16. Group 3 received H7N9 MIV at day 0 and at week 16. Groups with statistically significant responses are marked with corresponding p-values (Student’s t-test in log measurements)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Neutralizing antibody responses (ID80) by group assignment. Geometric mean titers and 95% confidence intervals are shown at baseline, the day of boost, and 2 weeks following the H7N9 boost. Group 1 received H7 DNA at day 0 and H7N9 MIV at week 16. Group 2 received both H7 DNA and H7N9 MIV prime at day 0 and H7N9 MIV at week 16. Group 3 received H7N9 MIV at day 0 and at week 16. Groups with statistically significant responses are marked with corresponding p-values (Student’s t-test in log measurements)

References

    1. Gao R, et al. Human infection with a novel avian-origin influenza A (H7N9) virus. N. Eng. J. Med. 2013;368:1888–1897. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1304459. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Watanabe T, Watanabe S, Maher EA, Neumann G, Kawaoka Y. Pandemic potential of avian influenza A (H7N9) viruses. Trends Microbiol. 2014;22:623–631. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2014.08.008. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Li Q, et al. Epidemiology of human infections with avian influenza A(H7N9) virus in China. N. Eng. J. Med. 2014;370,:520–532. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1304617. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Uyeki TM, Cox NJ. Global concerns regarding novel influenza A (H7N9) virus infections. N. Eng. J. Med. 2013;368:1862–1864. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1304661. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Farooqui A, et al. Probable hospital cluster of H7N9 influenza infection. N. Eng. J. Med. 2016;374:596–598. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1505359. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources